============================ rpmlint session starts ============================
rpmlint: 2.6.1
configuration:
    /opt/testing/lib64/python3.11/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/cron-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/dbus-services.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/device-files-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/licenses.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/opensuse.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/pam-modules.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/permissions-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/pie-executables.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/polkit-rules-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/scoring.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/security.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/sudoers-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/sysctl-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/systemd-tmpfiles.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/users-groups.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/world-writable-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/zypper-plugins.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring-strict.override.toml
checks: 41, packages: 5

cantor.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/applications/org.kde.cantor.desktop
This text file has executable bits set or is located in a path dedicated for
executables, but lacks a shebang and cannot thus be executed. If the file is
meant to be an executable script, add the shebang, otherwise remove the
executable bits or move the file elsewhere.

cantor.x86_64: W: no-soname /usr/lib64/cantor_pythonbackend.so
The library has no soname.

cantor.spec: W: no-%check-section
The spec file does not contain an %check section. Please check if the package
has a testsuite and what it takes to enable the testsuite as part of the
package build. If it is not possible to run it in the build environment
(OBS/koji) or no testsuite exists, then please ignore this warning. You should
not insert an empty %check section.

cantor.spec:125: W: macro-in-comment %{optflags}
cantor.spec:125: W: macro-in-comment %{_includedir}
cantor.spec:125: W: macro-in-comment %{_includedir}
There is a unescaped macro after a shell style comment in the specfile. Macros
are expanded everywhere, so check if it can cause a problem in this case and
escape the macro with another leading % if appropriate.

libcantorlibs28.x86_64: W: files-duplicate /usr/share/licenses/libcantorlibs28/GPL-2.0-or-later.txt /usr/share/licenses/libcantorlibs28/GPL-2.0-only.txt
Your package contains duplicated files that are not hard- or symlinks. You
should use the %fdupes macro to link the files to one.

Check time report (>1% & >0.1s):
    Check                            Duration (in s)   Fraction (in %)  Checked files
    BinariesCheck                                0.4              50.2               
    ExtractRpm                                   0.2              21.9               
    TOTAL                                        0.8             100.0               

 5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 6 warnings, 76 filtered, 1 badness; has taken 0.9 s