============================ rpmlint session starts ============================
rpmlint: 2.5.0
configuration:
    /opt/testing/lib64/python3.11/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/cron-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/dbus-services.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/device-files-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/licenses.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/opensuse.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/pam-modules.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/permissions-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/pie-executables.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/polkit-rules-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/scoring.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/security.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/sudoers-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/sysctl-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/systemd-tmpfiles.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/users-groups.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/world-writable-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/zypper-plugins.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring-strict.override.toml
checks: 41, packages: 3

deepin-desktop-schemas-branding-upstream.noarch: E: suse-zypp-packageand packageand(deepin-desktop-schemas:branding-upstream)
The 'packageand(package1:package2)' syntax is obsolete, please use boolean
dependencies like: 'Supplements: (package1 and package2)'

deepin-desktop-schemas-branding-upstream.noarch: E: suse-zypp-otherproviders otherproviders(deepin-desktop-schemas-branding)
The 'otherproviders(symbol)' syntax is obsolete, it is not needed and you can
use the 'symbol' directly: 'Conflicts: symbol'

deepin-desktop-schemas.spec: W: no-%check-section
The spec file does not contain an %check section.  Even if some packages don't
directly need it, section markers may be overridden in rpm's configuration to
provide additional 'under the hood' functionality.  Add the section, even if
empty.

deepin-desktop-schemas-branding-upstream.noarch: E: branding-supplements-missing (deepin-desktop-schemas and branding-upstream)
Branding packages should provide a supplement in the form: 'Supplements:
(basepackage and branding-<flavor>)'

deepin-desktop-schemas-branding-upstream.noarch: E: branding-conflicts-missing deepin-desktop-schemas-branding
Branding packages should conflict with other flavors of the branding package
by using: 'Conflicts: pkg-branding = brandingversion' and not directly by
listing all the alternative brandings in it.

Check time report (>1% & >0.1s):
    Check                            Duration (in s)   Fraction (in %)  Checked files
    TOTAL                                        0.1             100.0               

 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 4 errors, 1 warnings, 5 filtered, 4 badness; has taken 0.1 s