============================ rpmlint session starts ============================
rpmlint: 2.5.0
configuration:
    /opt/testing/lib64/python3.11/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/cron-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/dbus-services.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/device-files-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/licenses.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/opensuse.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/pam-modules.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/permissions-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/pie-executables.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/polkit-rules-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/scoring.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/security.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/sudoers-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/sysctl-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/systemd-tmpfiles.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/users-groups.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/world-writable-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/zypper-plugins.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring-strict.override.toml
checks: 41, packages: 7

gnome-menus-branding-upstream.noarch: E: suse-zypp-packageand packageand(gnome-menus:branding-upstream)
The 'packageand(package1:package2)' syntax is obsolete, please use boolean
dependencies like: 'Supplements: (package1 and package2)'

gnome-menus.x86_64: W: package-with-huge-docs 59%
More than half the size of your package is documentation. Consider splitting
it into a -doc subpackage.

gnome-menus-branding-upstream.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/xdg/menus/gnome-applications.menu
A non-executable file in your package is being installed in /etc, but is not a
configuration file. All non-executable files in /etc should be configuration
files. Mark the file as %config in the spec file.

gnome-menus.x86_64: E: no-binary
The package should be of the noarch architecture because it doesn't contain
any binaries.

gnome-menus.spec: W: no-%check-section
The spec file does not contain an %check section.  Even if some packages don't
directly need it, section markers may be overridden in rpm's configuration to
provide additional 'under the hood' functionality.  Add the section, even if
empty.

gnome-menus-branding-upstream.noarch: E: branding-supplements-missing (gnome-menus and branding-upstream)
Branding packages should provide a supplement in the form: 'Supplements:
(basepackage and branding-<flavor>)'

Check time report (>1% & >0.1s):
    Check                            Duration (in s)   Fraction (in %)  Checked files
    TOTAL                                        0.2             100.0               

 7 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 3 warnings, 17 filtered, 3 badness; has taken 0.2 s