============================ rpmlint session starts ============================ rpmlint: 2.6.1 configuration: /opt/testing/lib64/python3.11/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/cron-whitelist.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/dbus-services.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/device-files-whitelist.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/licenses.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/opensuse.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/pam-modules.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/permissions-whitelist.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/pie-executables.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/polkit-rules-whitelist.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/scoring.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/security.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/sudoers-whitelist.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/sysctl-whitelist.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/systemd-tmpfiles.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/users-groups.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/world-writable-whitelist.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/zypper-plugins.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring-strict.override.toml checks: 41, packages: 10 mvapich3-ofi_3_0-gnu-hpc-macros-devel.x86_64: E: suse-zypp-otherproviders otherproviders(mvapich3-hpc-macros-devel) The 'otherproviders(symbol)' syntax is obsolete, it is not needed and you can use the 'symbol' directly: 'Conflicts: symbol' mvapich3-ofi_3_0-gnu-hpc-devel.x86_64: E: rpath-in-buildconfig /usr/lib/hpc/gnu14/mpi/mvapich3-ofi/3.0/lib64/pkgconfig/mvapich.pc lines 12 This build configuration file contains rpaths which will be introduced into dependent packages. mvapich3-ofi_3_0-gnu-hpc-macros-devel.x86_64: W: non-etc-or-var-file-marked-as-conffile /usr/lib/rpm/macros.d/macros.hpc-mvapich3 A file not in /etc or /var is marked as being a configuration file (%config). Please put your configuration files in /etc or /var. mvapich3-ofi-gnu-hpc.x86_64: E: no-binary mvapich3-ofi-gnu-hpc-devel.x86_64: E: no-binary mvapich3-ofi_3_0-gnu-hpc-devel.x86_64: E: no-binary mvapich3-ofi_3_0-gnu-hpc-doc.x86_64: E: no-binary mvapich3-ofi_3_0-gnu-hpc-macros-devel.x86_64: E: no-binary The package should be of the noarch architecture because it doesn't contain any binaries. mvapich3-ofi_3_0-gnu-hpc.src: E: invalid-spec-name The spec file name (without the .spec suffix) must match the package name ('Name:' tag). mvapich3-ofi_3_0-gnu-hpc.x86_64: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/lmod/moduledeps/gnu-14/mvapich3-ofi/.version.3.0 The file or directory is hidden. You should see if this is normal, and delete it from the package if not. Check time report (>1% & >0.1s): Check Duration (in s) Fraction (in %) Checked files BinariesCheck 1.1 48.4 ExtractRpm 0.6 26.0 SignatureCheck 0.3 12.6 BuildRootAndDateCheck 0.1 4.7 FilesCheck 0.1 4.3 TOTAL 2.3 100.0 10 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 8 errors, 2 warnings, 35 filtered, 8 badness; has taken 2.4 s