============================ rpmlint session starts ============================
rpmlint: 2.5.0
configuration:
    /opt/testing/lib64/python3.11/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/cron-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/dbus-services.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/device-files-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/licenses.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/opensuse.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/pam-modules.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/permissions-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/pie-executables.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/polkit-rules-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/scoring.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/security.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/sudoers-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/sysctl-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/systemd-tmpfiles.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/users-groups.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/world-writable-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/zypper-plugins.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring-strict.override.toml
checks: 41, packages: 3

sbl-orca.x86_64: E: summary-not-capitalized (Badness: 20) brld-orca brlapi
Summary doesn't begin with a capital letter.

sbl.x86_64: E: spurious-executable-perm (Badness: 50) /usr/share/man/man8/brld.8.gz
The file is installed with executable permissions, but was identified as one
that probably should not be executable. Verify if the executable bits are
desired, and remove if not.

sbl.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/sbl/brltbl/french
sbl.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/sbl/brltbl/german
sbl.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/sbl/brltbl/spanish
sbl.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/sbl/brltbl/swedish
sbl.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/sbl/brltbl/uk
sbl.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/sbl/brltbl/us
sbl.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/sbl/spk/apollo2
sbl.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/sbl/spk/festival
sbl.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/sbl/spk/mbrola
sbl.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/sbl/spk/speechd
sbl.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/sbl/spk/ttsynth
sbl.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/sbl/spk/vox700
A non-executable file in your package is being installed in /etc, but is not a
configuration file. All non-executable files in /etc should be configuration
files. Mark the file as %config in the spec file.

sbl.x86_64: W: no-url-tag
sbl-orca.x86_64: W: no-url-tag
sbl.src: W: no-url-tag
The URL tag is missing.

sbl.spec: W: no-%check-section
The spec file does not contain an %check section. Please check if the package
has a testsuite and what it takes to enable the testsuite as part of the
package build. If it is not possible to run it in the build environment
(OBS/koji) or no testsuite exists, then please ignore this warning. You should
not insert an empty %check section.

sbl.x86_64: W: files-duplicate /etc/sbl/keymap/el2ds.map /etc/sbl/keymap/el2d.map
Your package contains duplicated files that are not hard- or symlinks. You
should use the %fdupes macro to link the files to one.

sbl.x86_64: E: devel-file-in-non-devel-package (Badness: 50) /usr/lib64/libbrld.so
A file that is needed only e.g. when developing or building software is
included in a non-devel package. These files should go in devel packages.

sbl.x86_64: W: binary-or-shlib-calls-gethostbyname /usr/lib64/libbrld.so.1.0
sbl.x86_64: W: binary-or-shlib-calls-gethostbyname /usr/sbin/brld
sbl.x86_64: W: binary-or-shlib-calls-gethostbyname /usr/sbin/sbl
The binary calls gethostbyname. Please port the code to use getaddrinfo.

Check time report (>1% & >0.1s):
    Check                            Duration (in s)   Fraction (in %)  Checked files
    BinariesCheck                                0.1              55.0               
    TOTAL                                        0.2             100.0               

 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 20 warnings, 196 filtered, 120 badness; has taken 0.2 s