============================ rpmlint session starts ============================
rpmlint: 2.5.0
configuration:
    /opt/testing/lib64/python3.11/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/cron-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/dbus-services.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/device-files-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/licenses.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/opensuse.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/pam-modules.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/permissions-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/pie-executables.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/polkit-rules-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/scoring.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/security.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/sudoers-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/sysctl-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/systemd-tmpfiles.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/users-groups.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/world-writable-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/zypper-plugins.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring-strict.override.toml
checks: 41, packages: 6

terminology-theme-upstream.x86_64: E: suse-zypp-otherproviders otherproviders(terminology-theme-dft)
The 'otherproviders(symbol)' syntax is obsolete, it is not needed and you can
use the 'symbol' directly: 'Conflicts: symbol'

terminology-theme-Flat.x86_64: E: no-binary
terminology-theme-misc.x86_64: E: no-binary
terminology-theme-upstream.x86_64: E: no-binary
The package should be of the noarch architecture because it doesn't contain
any binaries.

terminology.spec: W: no-%check-section
The spec file does not contain an %check section.  Even if some packages don't
directly need it, section markers may be overridden in rpm's configuration to
provide additional 'under the hood' functionality.  Add the section, even if
empty.

terminology-lang.noarch: E: incorrect-locale-subdir /usr/share/locale/zh_Hans/LC_MESSAGES/terminology.mo
terminology-theme-Flat.x86_64: E: branding-supplements-missing (terminology and theme-Flat)
terminology-theme-misc.x86_64: E: branding-supplements-missing (terminology and theme-misc)
terminology-theme-upstream.x86_64: E: branding-supplements-missing (terminology and theme-upstream)
Branding packages should provide a supplement in the form: 'Supplements:
(basepackage and branding-<flavor>)'

terminology.x86_64: E: branding-requires-specific-flavor terminology-theme-dft
Packages must not require a specific branding or theme package to allow for
different themes.

terminology-theme-Flat.x86_64: E: branding-provides-unversioned terminology-theme
terminology-theme-misc.x86_64: E: branding-provides-unversioned terminology-theme
Please make sure that your provides entry reads like: 'Provides:
%name-branding = %version'

terminology-theme-Flat.x86_64: E: branding-conflicts-missing terminology-theme
terminology-theme-misc.x86_64: E: branding-conflicts-missing terminology-theme
terminology-theme-upstream.x86_64: E: branding-conflicts-missing terminology-theme
Branding packages should conflict with other flavors of the branding package
by using: 'Conflicts: pkg-branding = brandingversion' and not directly by
listing all the alternative brandings in it.

Check time report (>1% & >0.1s):
    Check                            Duration (in s)   Fraction (in %)  Checked files
    TOTAL                                        0.2             100.0               

 6 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 14 errors, 1 warnings, 15 filtered, 14 badness; has taken 0.2 s