============================ rpmlint session starts ============================ rpmlint: 2.5.0 configuration: /opt/testing/lib/python3.11/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/cron-whitelist.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/dbus-services.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/device-files-whitelist.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/licenses.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/opensuse.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/pam-modules.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/permissions-whitelist.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/pie-executables.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/polkit-rules-whitelist.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/scoring.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/security.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/sudoers-whitelist.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/sysctl-whitelist.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/systemd-tmpfiles.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/users-groups.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/world-writable-whitelist.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/zypper-plugins.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring-strict.override.toml rpmlintrc: /home/abuild/rpmbuild/SOURCES/texlive-specs-m-rpmlintrc checks: 41, packages: 351 texlive-specs-m.src: E: unused-rpmlintrc-filter ".*dangling-symlink.*/fonts/.*" texlive-specs-m.src: E: unused-rpmlintrc-filter ".*dangling-symlink.*/zypper\.py.*" texlive-specs-m.src: E: unused-rpmlintrc-filter ".*devel-file-in-non-devel-package.*/doc/.*" texlive-specs-m.src: E: unused-rpmlintrc-filter ".*E:.*files-duplicated-waste.*" texlive-specs-m.src: E: unused-rpmlintrc-filter ".*spelling-error.*" texlive-specs-m.src: E: unused-rpmlintrc-filter ".*incorrect-fsf-address.*" texlive-specs-m.src: E: unused-rpmlintrc-filter ".*wrong-script-end-of-line-encoding.*" texlive-specs-m.src: E: unused-rpmlintrc-filter ".*script-without-shebang.*/doc/.*" texlive-specs-m.src: E: unused-rpmlintrc-filter ".*wrong-script-interpreter.*/doc/.*" texlive-junicode-fonts.noarch: W: self-obsoletion ctan-junicode-fonts <= 0.7.8 obsoletes ctan-junicode-fonts The package obsoletes itself. This is known to cause errors in various tools and should thus be avoided, usually by using appropriately versioned Obsoletes and/or Provides and avoiding unversioned ones. texlive-ketcindy-doc.noarch: W: potential-bashisms /usr/share/texmf/doc/support/ketcindy/forMac/setketcindy.command texlive-ketcindy-doc.noarch: W: potential-bashisms /usr/share/texmf/doc/support/ketcindy/forLinux/setwork.sh texlive-ketcindy-doc.noarch: W: potential-bashisms /usr/share/texmf/doc/support/ketcindy/forMac/setwork.command texlive-ketcindy-doc.noarch: W: potential-bashisms /usr/share/texmf/doc/support/ketcindy/forLinux/setketcindy.sh texlive-kpathsea.noarch: W: potential-bashisms /usr/share/texmf/web2c/mktexnam checkbashisms reported potential bashisms in a /bin/sh shell script, you might want to manually check this script for bashisms. texlive-specs-m.spec: W: no-%check-section The spec file does not contain an %check section. Please check if the package has a testsuite and what it takes to enable the testsuite as part of the package build. If it is not possible to run it in the build environment (OBS/koji) or no testsuite exists, then please ignore this warning. You should not insert an empty %check section. texlive-ketcindy.noarch: E: devel-file-in-non-devel-package (Badness: 50) /usr/share/texmf/scripts/ketcindy/ketlibC/ketcommon.h texlive-ketcindy.noarch: E: devel-file-in-non-devel-package (Badness: 50) /usr/share/texmf/scripts/ketcindy/ketlibC/ketcommonhead.h texlive-ketcindy.noarch: E: devel-file-in-non-devel-package (Badness: 50) /usr/share/texmf/scripts/ketcindy/ketlibC/surflib.h texlive-ketcindy.noarch: E: devel-file-in-non-devel-package (Badness: 50) /usr/share/texmf/scripts/ketcindy/ketlibC/surflibhead.h A file that is needed only e.g. when developing or building software is included in a non-devel package. These files should go in devel packages. texlive-ketcindy.noarch: W: class-path-in-manifest /usr/share/texmf/scripts/ketcindy/ketjava/KetCindyPlugin.jar The META-INF/MANIFEST.MF file in the jar contains a hardcoded Class-Path. These entries do not work with older Java versions and even if they do work, they are inflexible and usually cause nasty surprises. Check time report (>1% & >0.1s): Check Duration (in s) Fraction (in %) Checked files ExtractRpm 28.0 56.0 SignatureCheck 7.0 14.1 SpecCheck 3.4 6.8 FilesCheck 2.5 5.0 BuildRootAndDateCheck 2.5 5.0 BashismsCheck 1.8 3.6 PostCheck 1.8 3.6 TagsCheck 1.1 2.3 DuplicatesCheck 0.7 1.3 FilelistCheck 0.5 1.1 TOTAL 50.0 100.0 351 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 13 errors, 8 warnings, 16962 filtered, 209 badness; has taken 51.3 s