============================ rpmlint session starts ============================ rpmlint: 2.5.0 configuration: /opt/testing/lib64/python3.11/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/cron-whitelist.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/dbus-services.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/device-files-whitelist.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/licenses.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/opensuse.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/pam-modules.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/permissions-whitelist.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/pie-executables.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/polkit-rules-whitelist.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/scoring.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/security.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/sudoers-whitelist.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/sysctl-whitelist.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/systemd-tmpfiles.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/users-groups.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/world-writable-whitelist.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/zypper-plugins.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring-strict.override.toml checks: 41, packages: 4 deepin-launcher-branding-upstream.noarch: E: suse-zypp-packageand packageand(deepin-launcher:branding-upstream) The 'packageand(package1:package2)' syntax is obsolete, please use boolean dependencies like: 'Supplements: (package1 and package2)' deepin-launcher-branding-upstream.noarch: E: suse-zypp-otherproviders otherproviders(deepin-launcher-branding) The 'otherproviders(symbol)' syntax is obsolete, it is not needed and you can use the 'symbol' directly: 'Conflicts: symbol' deepin-icon-theme.spec: W: no-%check-section The spec file does not contain an %check section. Please check if the package has a testsuite and what it takes to enable the testsuite as part of the package build. If it is not possible to run it in the build environment (OBS/koji) or no testsuite exists, then please ignore this warning. You should not insert an empty %check section. deepin-icon-theme.spec:67: W: make-check-outside-check-section make check-perm Make check or other automated regression test should be run in %check, as they can be disabled with a rpm macro for short circuiting purposes. deepin-icon-theme-vintage.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/icons/Vintage/mimetypes/128/.hidden The file or directory is hidden. You should see if this is normal, and delete it from the package if not. deepin-icon-theme-vintage.noarch: E: branding-supplements-missing (deepin-icon and theme-vintage) deepin-launcher-branding-upstream.noarch: E: branding-supplements-missing (deepin-launcher and branding-upstream) Branding packages should provide a supplement in the form: 'Supplements: (basepackage and branding-)' deepin-icon-theme-vintage.noarch: E: branding-provides-missing Please add a provides entry similar to: 'Provides: %name-branding = %version' deepin-icon-theme-vintage.noarch: E: branding-conflicts-missing deepin-icon-theme deepin-launcher-branding-upstream.noarch: E: branding-conflicts-missing deepin-launcher-branding Branding packages should conflict with other flavors of the branding package by using: 'Conflicts: pkg-branding = brandingversion' and not directly by listing all the alternative brandings in it. Check time report (>1% & >0.1s): Check Duration (in s) Fraction (in %) Checked files ExtractRpm 8.8 45.5 FilesCheck 4.9 25.5 BuildRootAndDateCheck 1.7 8.6 BashismsCheck 1.4 7.2 FilelistCheck 0.9 4.5 SignatureCheck 0.6 3.0 FileDigestCheck 0.2 1.3 TOTAL 19.4 100.0 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 7 errors, 3 warnings, 1261 filtered, 7 badness; has taken 20.7 s