============================ rpmlint session starts ============================
rpmlint: 2.6.1
configuration:
    /opt/testing/lib64/python3.11/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/cron-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/dbus-services.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/device-files-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/licenses.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/opensuse.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/pam-modules.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/permissions-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/pie-executables.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/polkit-rules-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/scoring.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/security.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/sudoers-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/sysctl-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/systemd-tmpfiles.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/users-groups.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/world-writable-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/zypper-plugins.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring-strict.override.toml
checks: 41, packages: 8

faenza-icon-theme.spec: W: no-%check-section
The spec file does not contain an %check section. Please check if the package
has a testsuite and what it takes to enable the testsuite as part of the
package build. If it is not possible to run it in the build environment
(OBS/koji) or no testsuite exists, then please ignore this warning. You should
not insert an empty %check section.

faenza-icon-theme.noarch: W: ghost-files-without-postin
faenza-icon-theme-ambiance.noarch: W: ghost-files-without-postin
faenza-icon-theme-dark.noarch: W: ghost-files-without-postin
faenza-icon-theme-darker.noarch: W: ghost-files-without-postin
faenza-icon-theme-darkest.noarch: W: ghost-files-without-postin
faenza-icon-theme-mint.noarch: W: ghost-files-without-postin
faenza-icon-theme-radiance.noarch: W: ghost-files-without-postin
faenza-icon-theme.noarch: W: empty-%post
faenza-icon-theme-ambiance.noarch: W: empty-%post
faenza-icon-theme-dark.noarch: W: empty-%post
faenza-icon-theme-darker.noarch: W: empty-%post
faenza-icon-theme-darkest.noarch: W: empty-%post
faenza-icon-theme-mint.noarch: W: empty-%post
faenza-icon-theme-radiance.noarch: W: empty-%post
faenza-icon-theme-ambiance.noarch: E: branding-supplements-missing (faenza-icon and theme-ambiance)
faenza-icon-theme-dark.noarch: E: branding-supplements-missing (faenza-icon and theme-dark)
faenza-icon-theme-darker.noarch: E: branding-supplements-missing (faenza-icon and theme-darker)
faenza-icon-theme-darkest.noarch: E: branding-supplements-missing (faenza-icon and theme-darkest)
faenza-icon-theme-mint.noarch: E: branding-supplements-missing (faenza-icon and theme-mint)
faenza-icon-theme-radiance.noarch: E: branding-supplements-missing (faenza-icon and theme-radiance)
Branding packages should provide a supplement in the form: 'Supplements:
(basepackage and branding-<flavor>)'

faenza-icon-theme.noarch: E: branding-requires-unversioned gnome-icon-theme
Please make sure that your requires entry is similar to: 'Requires:
%name-branding = <versionnumber>'

faenza-icon-theme-ambiance.noarch: E: branding-provides-missing
faenza-icon-theme-dark.noarch: E: branding-provides-missing
faenza-icon-theme-darker.noarch: E: branding-provides-missing
faenza-icon-theme-darkest.noarch: E: branding-provides-missing
faenza-icon-theme-mint.noarch: E: branding-provides-missing
faenza-icon-theme-radiance.noarch: E: branding-provides-missing
Please add a provides entry similar to: 'Provides: %name-branding = %version'

faenza-icon-theme-ambiance.noarch: E: branding-conflicts-missing faenza-icon-theme
faenza-icon-theme-dark.noarch: E: branding-conflicts-missing faenza-icon-theme
faenza-icon-theme-darker.noarch: E: branding-conflicts-missing faenza-icon-theme
faenza-icon-theme-darkest.noarch: E: branding-conflicts-missing faenza-icon-theme
faenza-icon-theme-mint.noarch: E: branding-conflicts-missing faenza-icon-theme
faenza-icon-theme-radiance.noarch: E: branding-conflicts-missing faenza-icon-theme
Branding packages should conflict with other flavors of the branding package
by using: 'Conflicts: pkg-branding = brandingversion' and not directly by
listing all the alternative brandings in it.

Check time report (>1% & >0.1s):
    Check                            Duration (in s)   Fraction (in %)  Checked files
    ExtractRpm                                   3.9              26.6               
    SUIDPermissionsCheck                         3.1              21.5               
    FilesCheck                                   2.8              19.1               
    BuildRootAndDateCheck                        1.9              13.1               
    BashismsCheck                                1.0               6.7               
    FilelistCheck                                0.7               5.0               
    SignatureCheck                               0.3               1.9               
    FileDigestCheck                              0.1               1.0               
    TOTAL                                       14.5             100.0               

 8 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 19 errors, 15 warnings, 7251 filtered, 19 badness; has taken 15.2 s