============================ rpmlint session starts ============================ rpmlint: 2.6.1 configuration: /opt/testing/lib64/python3.11/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/cron-whitelist.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/dbus-services.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/device-files-whitelist.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/licenses.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/opensuse.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/pam-modules.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/permissions-whitelist.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/pie-executables.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/polkit-rules-whitelist.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/scoring.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/security.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/sudoers-whitelist.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/sysctl-whitelist.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/systemd-tmpfiles.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/users-groups.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/world-writable-whitelist.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/zypper-plugins.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring-strict.override.toml checks: 41, packages: 4 groff-full.aarch64: W: zero-perms-ghost Suggestion: "%ghost %attr(0644,root,root) /etc/alternatives/roff.7.gz" Your package contains a file with no permissions. This is usually an error because the file won't be accessible by any user. You should check the file permissions and ensure that are correct or fix it using "%attr" macro in %files section. http://ftp.rpm.org/max-rpm/s1-rpm-anywhere-specifying-file-attributes.html groff-full.aarch64: E: update-alternatives-postun-call-missing The package does not call update-alternatives --remove in postun phase to remove all the configuration for each individual --install binary that was done in postun. groff-full.aarch64: E: suse-zypp-packageand packageand(groff:ghostscript-library) gxditview.aarch64: E: suse-zypp-packageand packageand(groff:xorg-x11-libX11) The 'packageand(package1:package2)' syntax is obsolete, please use boolean dependencies like: 'Supplements: (package1 and package2)' groff-full.aarch64: W: potential-bashisms /usr/bin/pdfroff checkbashisms reported potential bashisms in a /bin/sh shell script, you might want to manually check this script for bashisms. groff-full.aarch64: W: package-with-huge-docs 66% More than half the size of your package is documentation. Consider splitting it into a -doc subpackage. groff-full.aarch64: I: package-supports-update-alternatives groff-full.aarch64: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/groff/1.23.0/font/devdvi/generate/CompileFonts 644 /bin/sh This text file contains a shebang or is located in a path dedicated for executables, but lacks the executable bits and cannot thus be executed. If the file is meant to be an executable script, add the executable bits, otherwise remove the shebang or move the file elsewhere. groff.spec: W: no-%check-section The spec file does not contain an %check section. Please check if the package has a testsuite and what it takes to enable the testsuite as part of the package build. If it is not possible to run it in the build environment (OBS/koji) or no testsuite exists, then please ignore this warning. You should not insert an empty %check section. groff-full.src: E: invalid-spec-name The spec file name (without the .spec suffix) must match the package name ('Name:' tag). Check time report (>1% & >0.1s): Check Duration (in s) Fraction (in %) Checked files BashismsCheck 1.0 44.3 ExtractRpm 0.5 20.4 BinariesCheck 0.3 14.0 FilesCheck 0.1 6.4 SignatureCheck 0.1 5.4 TOTAL 2.3 100.0 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 5 errors, 4 warnings, 28 filtered, 5 badness; has taken 2.3 s