============================ rpmlint session starts ============================
rpmlint: 2.6.1
configuration:
    /opt/testing/lib64/python3.11/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/cron-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/dbus-services.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/device-files-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/licenses.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/opensuse.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/pam-modules.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/permissions-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/pie-executables.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/polkit-rules-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/scoring.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/security.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/sudoers-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/sysctl-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/systemd-tmpfiles.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/users-groups.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/world-writable-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/zypper-plugins.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring-strict.override.toml
checks: 41, packages: 3

webalizer.spec: E: superfluous-%clean-section
The spec section %clean should not be used any longer. RPM provides its own
clean logic.

webalizer.spec: W: no-%check-section
The spec file does not contain an %check section. Please check if the package
has a testsuite and what it takes to enable the testsuite as part of the
package build. If it is not possible to run it in the build environment
(OBS/koji) or no testsuite exists, then please ignore this warning. You should
not insert an empty %check section.

webalizer.spec:125: W: macro-in-comment %{name}
There is a unescaped macro after a shell style comment in the specfile. Macros
are expanded everywhere, so check if it can cause a problem in this case and
escape the macro with another leading % if appropriate.

webalizer-flags.noarch: W: files-duplicate /srv/www/htdocs/webalizer/flags/mf.png /srv/www/htdocs/webalizer/flags/bl.png
webalizer-flags.noarch: W: files-duplicate /srv/www/htdocs/webalizer/flags/sj.png /srv/www/htdocs/webalizer/flags/bv.png:/srv/www/htdocs/webalizer/flags/no.png
webalizer-flags.noarch: W: files-duplicate /srv/www/htdocs/webalizer/flags/yu.png /srv/www/htdocs/webalizer/flags/cs.png
webalizer-flags.noarch: W: files-duplicate /srv/www/htdocs/webalizer/flags/yt.png /srv/www/htdocs/webalizer/flags/fr.png:/srv/www/htdocs/webalizer/flags/fx.png:/srv/www/htdocs/webalizer/flags/gf.png:/srv/www/htdocs/webalizer/flags/gp.png:/srv/www/htdocs/webalizer/flags/mq.png:(and 3 more)
webalizer-flags.noarch: W: files-duplicate /srv/www/htdocs/webalizer/flags/td.png /srv/www/htdocs/webalizer/flags/ro.png
webalizer-flags.noarch: W: files-duplicate /srv/www/htdocs/webalizer/flags/tp.png /srv/www/htdocs/webalizer/flags/tl.png
webalizer-flags.noarch: W: files-duplicate /srv/www/htdocs/webalizer/flags/us.png /srv/www/htdocs/webalizer/flags/um.png
Your package contains duplicated files that are not hard- or symlinks. You
should use the %fdupes macro to link the files to one.

Check time report (>1% & >0.1s):
    Check                            Duration (in s)   Fraction (in %)  Checked files
    TOTAL                                        0.2             100.0               

 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 9 warnings, 6 filtered, 1 badness; has taken 0.3 s