============================ rpmlint session starts ============================
rpmlint: 2.2.0
configuration:
    /opt/testing/lib/python3.8/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/cron-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/dbus-services.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/device-files-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/licenses.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/opensuse.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/pam-modules.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/permissions-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/pie-executables.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/polkit-rules-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/scoring.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/security.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/users-groups.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/world-writable-whitelist.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring-strict.override.toml
checks: 40, packages: 2

mozc.src: W: name-repeated-in-summary Mozc
The name of the package is repeated in its summary. Make the summary brief and
to the point without including redundant information in it.

mozc.spec:351: W: macro-in-comment %{output_dir}
mozc.spec:355: W: macro-in-comment %{buildroot}
mozc.spec:355: W: macro-in-comment %{_datadir}
There is a unescaped macro after a shell style comment in the specfile. Macros
are expanded everywhere, so check if it can cause a problem in this case and
escape the macro with another leading % if appropriate.

fcitx5-mozc.armv7hl: W: files-duplicate /usr/share/pixmaps/mozc-direct.png /usr/share/pixmaps/mozc-alpha_full.png
 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 5 warnings, 0 badness; has taken 2.0 s