============================ rpmlint session starts ============================
rpmlint: 2.6.1
configuration:
    /opt/testing/lib/python3.11/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/cron-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/dbus-services.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/device-files-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/licenses.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/opensuse.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/pam-modules.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/permissions-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/pie-executables.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/polkit-rules-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/scoring.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/security.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/sudoers-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/sysctl-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/systemd-tmpfiles.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/users-groups.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/world-writable-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/zypper-plugins.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring-strict.override.toml
checks: 41, packages: 4

xfce4-session.armv7hl: W: zero-perms-ghost Suggestion: "%ghost %attr(0644,root,root) /etc/alternatives/default.desktop"
Your package contains a file with no permissions. This is usually an error
because the file won't be accessible by any user. You should check the file
permissions and ensure that are correct or fix it using "%attr" macro in
%files section.
http://ftp.rpm.org/max-rpm/s1-rpm-anywhere-specifying-file-attributes.html

xfce4-session-branding-upstream.noarch: E: suse-zypp-packageand packageand(xfce4-session:branding-upstream)
The 'packageand(package1:package2)' syntax is obsolete, please use boolean
dependencies like: 'Supplements: (package1 and package2)'

xfce4-session-branding-upstream.noarch: E: suse-zypp-otherproviders otherproviders(xfce4-session-branding)
The 'otherproviders(symbol)' syntax is obsolete, it is not needed and you can
use the 'symbol' directly: 'Conflicts: symbol'

xfce4-session.spec:41: W: suse-update-desktop-file-deprecated %suse_update_desktop_file is deprecated
The usage of %suse_update_desktop_file is deprecated and changes should be
migrated to the upstream. Please check the build log for details.

xfce4-session.armv7hl: W: potential-bashisms /etc/xdg/xfce4/xinitrc
checkbashisms reported potential bashisms in a /bin/sh shell script, you might
want to manually check this script for bashisms.

xfce4-session.armv7hl: I: package-supports-update-alternatives
xfce4-session.armv7hl: W: obsolete-not-provided libxfsm-4_6-0
xfce4-session.armv7hl: W: obsolete-not-provided xfce4-session-devel
If a package is obsoleted by a compatible replacement, the obsoleted package
should also be provided in order to not cause unnecessary dependency breakage.
If the obsoleting package is not a compatible replacement for the old one,
leave out the Provides.

xfce4-session.armv7hl: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/xdg/xfce4/xinitrc
A non-executable file in your package is being installed in /etc, but is not a
configuration file. All non-executable files in /etc should be configuration
files. Mark the file as %config in the spec file.

xfce4-session.spec: W: no-%check-section
The spec file does not contain an %check section. Please check if the package
has a testsuite and what it takes to enable the testsuite as part of the
package build. If it is not possible to run it in the build environment
(OBS/koji) or no testsuite exists, then please ignore this warning. You should
not insert an empty %check section.

xfce4-session-branding-upstream.noarch: E: branding-supplements-missing (xfce4-session and branding-upstream)
Branding packages should provide a supplement in the form: 'Supplements:
(basepackage and branding-<flavor>)'

xfce4-session.armv7hl: E: branding-requires-unversioned xfce4-session-branding
Please make sure that your requires entry is similar to: 'Requires:
%name-branding = <versionnumber>'

xfce4-session-branding-upstream.noarch: E: branding-conflicts-missing xfce4-session-branding
Branding packages should conflict with other flavors of the branding package
by using: 'Conflicts: pkg-branding = brandingversion' and not directly by
listing all the alternative brandings in it.

Check time report (>1% & >0.1s):
    Check                            Duration (in s)   Fraction (in %)  Checked files
    BashismsCheck                                0.5              54.0               
    ExtractRpm                                   0.1              14.2               
    BinariesCheck                                0.1              12.3               
    TOTAL                                        1.0             100.0               

 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 5 errors, 7 warnings, 19 filtered, 5 badness; has taken 1.0 s