============================ rpmlint session starts ============================ rpmlint: 2.6.1 configuration: /opt/testing/lib/python3.11/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/cron-whitelist.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/dbus-services.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/device-files-whitelist.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/licenses.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/opensuse.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/pam-modules.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/permissions-whitelist.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/pie-executables.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/polkit-rules-whitelist.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/scoring.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/security.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/sudoers-whitelist.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/sysctl-whitelist.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/systemd-tmpfiles.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/users-groups.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/world-writable-whitelist.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/zypper-plugins.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring-strict.override.toml rpmlintrc: /home/abuild/rpmbuild/SOURCES/gcc7-rpmlintrc checks: 41, packages: 2 gcc7-testresults.src: E: unused-rpmlintrc-filter "gcc.*devel-file-in-non-devel-package" gcc7-testresults.src: E: unused-rpmlintrc-filter "gcc.*devel-dependency glibc-devel" gcc7-testresults.src: E: unused-rpmlintrc-filter "gcc.*devel-dependency libstdc" gcc7-testresults.src: E: unused-rpmlintrc-filter "libstdc.*shlib-policy-missing-lib" gcc7-testresults.src: E: unused-rpmlintrc-filter "shlib-policy-name-error" gcc7-testresults.src: E: unused-rpmlintrc-filter "shlib-legacy-policy-name-error" gcc7-testresults.src: E: unused-rpmlintrc-filter "conflicts-with-provides" gcc7-testresults.src: E: unused-rpmlintrc-filter "invalid-license" gcc7-testresults.armv6hl: W: package-with-huge-docs 100% More than half the size of your package is documentation. Consider splitting it into a -doc subpackage. gcc7-testresults.armv6hl: E: no-binary The package should be of the noarch architecture because it doesn't contain any binaries. gcc7-testresults.spec: W: no-%check-section The spec file does not contain an %check section. Please check if the package has a testsuite and what it takes to enable the testsuite as part of the package build. If it is not possible to run it in the build environment (OBS/koji) or no testsuite exists, then please ignore this warning. You should not insert an empty %check section. Check time report (>1% & >0.1s): Check Duration (in s) Fraction (in %) Checked files ExtractRpm 3.9 66.4 BuildRootAndDateCheck 1.2 20.9 FilesCheck 0.4 7.0 SignatureCheck 0.3 4.4 TOTAL 5.8 100.0 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 9 errors, 2 warnings, 4 filtered, 9 badness; has taken 5.9 s