============================ rpmlint session starts ============================
rpmlint: 2.6.1
configuration:
    /opt/testing/lib/python3.11/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/cron-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/dbus-services.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/device-files-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/licenses.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/opensuse.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/pam-modules.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/permissions-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/pie-executables.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/polkit-rules-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/scoring.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/security.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/sudoers-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/sysctl-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/systemd-tmpfiles.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/users-groups.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/world-writable-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/zypper-plugins.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring-strict.override.toml
checks: 41, packages: 3

gutenprint.armv6hl: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib/cups/driver/gutenprint.5.3
This executable should be stripped from debugging symbols, in order to take
less space and be loaded faster. This is usually done automatically at
buildtime by rpm.

gutenprint-devel.armv6hl: E: no-binary
The package should be of the noarch architecture because it doesn't contain
any binaries.

gutenprint.spec: W: no-%check-section
The spec file does not contain an %check section. Please check if the package
has a testsuite and what it takes to enable the testsuite as part of the
package build. If it is not possible to run it in the build environment
(OBS/koji) or no testsuite exists, then please ignore this warning. You should
not insert an empty %check section.

gutenprint.armv6hl: W: name-repeated-in-summary Gutenprint
gutenprint.src: W: name-repeated-in-summary Gutenprint
The name of the package is repeated in its summary. Make the summary brief and
to the point without including redundant information in it.

gutenprint.spec:121: W: macro-in-comment %lang
There is a unescaped macro after a shell style comment in the specfile. Macros
are expanded everywhere, so check if it can cause a problem in this case and
escape the macro with another leading % if appropriate.

gutenprint.armv6hl: W: files-duplicate /usr/share/gutenprint/5.3/xml/escp2/media/pro_ultrachrome_k3v10.xml /usr/share/gutenprint/5.3/xml/escp2/media/pro_ultrachrome_k3v.xml
Your package contains duplicated files that are not hard- or symlinks. You
should use the %fdupes macro to link the files to one.

Check time report (>1% & >0.1s):
    Check                            Duration (in s)   Fraction (in %)  Checked files
    ExtractRpm                                   3.8              48.3               
    SUIDPermissionsCheck                         1.4              17.7               
    FilesCheck                                   0.6               7.4               
    BuildRootAndDateCheck                        0.5               6.7               
    BashismsCheck                                0.4               5.5               
    BinariesCheck                                0.4               5.4               
    FilelistCheck                                0.2               3.1               
    SignatureCheck                               0.1               1.8               
    TOTAL                                        7.9             100.0               

 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 6 warnings, 89 filtered, 1 badness; has taken 8.3 s