============================ rpmlint session starts ============================ rpmlint: 2.5.0 configuration: /opt/testing/lib/python3.11/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/cron-whitelist.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/dbus-services.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/device-files-whitelist.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/licenses.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/opensuse.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/pam-modules.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/permissions-whitelist.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/pie-executables.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/polkit-rules-whitelist.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/scoring.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/security.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/sudoers-whitelist.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/sysctl-whitelist.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/systemd-tmpfiles.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/users-groups.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/world-writable-whitelist.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/zypper-plugins.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring-strict.override.toml checks: 41, packages: 14 python3-nemo.armv6hl: W: obsolete-not-provided python2-nemo-devel If a package is obsoleted by a compatible replacement, the obsoleted package should also be provided in order to not cause unnecessary dependency breakage. If the obsoleting package is not a compatible replacement for the old one, leave out the Provides. nemo-extension-preview.armv6hl: E: non-devel-file-in-devel-package /usr/lib/nemo-preview/girepository-1.0/NemoPreview-1.0.typelib A non-development file is located in a devel package. nemo-extension-audio-tab.noarch: E: no-dependency-on python-base 3.11 nemo-extension-compare.noarch: E: no-dependency-on python-base 3.11 nemo-extension-emblems.noarch: E: no-dependency-on python-base 3.11 nemo-extension-pastebin.noarch: E: no-dependency-on python-base 3.11 nemo-extension-terminal.noarch: E: no-dependency-on python-base 3.11 nemo-extension-image-converter.armv6hl: E: no-binary The package should be of the noarch architecture because it doesn't contain any binaries. nemo-extensions.spec:487: W: macro-in-comment %{buildroot} nemo-extensions.spec:487: W: macro-in-comment %{_datadir} nemo-extensions.spec:488: W: macro-in-comment %{python3_sitelib} nemo-extensions.spec:488: W: macro-in-comment %{buildroot} nemo-extensions.spec:488: W: macro-in-comment %{_datadir} nemo-extensions.spec:555: W: macro-in-comment %{python3_sitelib} nemo-extensions.spec:556: W: macro-in-comment %{python3_sitelib} nemo-extensions.spec:556: W: macro-in-comment %{python_version_nodots} nemo-extensions.spec:557: W: macro-in-comment %{python3_sitelib} nemo-extensions.spec:557: W: macro-in-comment %{python_version_nodots} nemo-extensions.spec:636: W: macro-in-comment %{python3_sitelib} nemo-extensions.spec:637: W: macro-in-comment %{python3_sitelib} nemo-extensions.spec:637: W: macro-in-comment %{python_version_nodots} nemo-extensions.spec:638: W: macro-in-comment %{python3_sitelib} nemo-extensions.spec:638: W: macro-in-comment %{python_version_nodots} There is a unescaped macro after a shell style comment in the specfile. Macros are expanded everywhere, so check if it can cause a problem in this case and escape the macro with another leading % if appropriate. Check time report (>1% & >0.1s): Check Duration (in s) Fraction (in %) Checked files BashismsCheck 0.3 29.1 ExtractRpm 0.2 22.7 BinariesCheck 0.2 20.0 SignatureCheck 0.2 15.5 TOTAL 1.0 100.0 14 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 7 errors, 16 warnings, 24 filtered, 7 badness; has taken 1.0 s