============================ rpmlint session starts ============================ rpmlint: 2.6.1 configuration: /opt/testing/lib/python3.11/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/cron-whitelist.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/dbus-services.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/device-files-whitelist.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/licenses.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/opensuse.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/pam-modules.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/permissions-whitelist.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/pie-executables.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/polkit-rules-whitelist.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/scoring.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/security.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/sudoers-whitelist.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/sysctl-whitelist.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/systemd-tmpfiles.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/users-groups.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/world-writable-whitelist.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/zypper-plugins.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring-strict.override.toml checks: 41, packages: 25 plymouth.armv6hl: W: zero-perms-ghost Suggestion: "%ghost %attr(0644,root,root) /etc/plymouth/plymouthd.conf" plymouth.armv6hl: W: zero-perms-ghost Suggestion: "%ghost %attr(0644,root,root) /var/lib/plymouth/boot-duration" plymouth.armv6hl: W: zero-perms-ghost Suggestion: "%ghost %attr(0644,root,root) /var/log/boot.log" Your package contains a file with no permissions. This is usually an error because the file won't be accessible by any user. You should check the file permissions and ensure that are correct or fix it using "%attr" macro in %files section. http://ftp.rpm.org/max-rpm/s1-rpm-anywhere-specifying-file-attributes.html plymouth.spec:68: W: suse-update-desktop-file-deprecated %suse_update_desktop_file is deprecated The usage of %suse_update_desktop_file is deprecated and changes should be migrated to the upstream. Please check the build log for details. plymouth-devel.armv6hl: E: no-binary The package should be of the noarch architecture because it doesn't contain any binaries. plymouth.spec: W: no-%check-section The spec file does not contain an %check section. Please check if the package has a testsuite and what it takes to enable the testsuite as part of the package build. If it is not possible to run it in the build environment (OBS/koji) or no testsuite exists, then please ignore this warning. You should not insert an empty %check section. plymouth-theme-spinfinity.noarch: W: files-duplicate /usr/share/plymouth/themes/spinfinity/throbber-33.png /usr/share/plymouth/themes/spinfinity/animation-0001.png:/usr/share/plymouth/themes/spinfinity/throbber-16.png Your package contains duplicated files that are not hard- or symlinks. You should use the %fdupes macro to link the files to one. libply-boot-client5.armv6hl: E: devel-file-in-non-devel-package (Badness: 50) /usr/lib/libply-boot-client.so libply-splash-core5.armv6hl: E: devel-file-in-non-devel-package (Badness: 50) /usr/lib/libply-splash-core.so libply-splash-graphics5.armv6hl: E: devel-file-in-non-devel-package (Badness: 50) /usr/lib/libply-splash-graphics.so libply5.armv6hl: E: devel-file-in-non-devel-package (Badness: 50) /usr/lib/libply.so A file that is needed only e.g. when developing or building software is included in a non-devel package. These files should go in devel packages. plymouth-branding-upstream.noarch: E: branding-supplements-missing (plymouth and branding-upstream) plymouth-theme-bgrt.noarch: E: branding-supplements-missing (plymouth and theme-bgrt) plymouth-theme-fade-in.noarch: E: branding-supplements-missing (plymouth and theme-fade-in) plymouth-theme-script.noarch: E: branding-supplements-missing (plymouth and theme-script) plymouth-theme-solar.noarch: E: branding-supplements-missing (plymouth and theme-solar) plymouth-theme-spinfinity.noarch: E: branding-supplements-missing (plymouth and theme-spinfinity) plymouth-theme-spinner.noarch: E: branding-supplements-missing (plymouth and theme-spinner) plymouth-theme-tribar.noarch: E: branding-supplements-missing (plymouth and theme-tribar) Branding packages should provide a supplement in the form: 'Supplements: (basepackage and branding-)' plymouth.armv6hl: E: branding-requires-unversioned plymouth-branding Please make sure that your requires entry is similar to: 'Requires: %name-branding = ' plymouth-theme-bgrt.noarch: E: branding-provides-missing plymouth-theme-fade-in.noarch: E: branding-provides-missing plymouth-theme-script.noarch: E: branding-provides-missing plymouth-theme-solar.noarch: E: branding-provides-missing plymouth-theme-spinfinity.noarch: E: branding-provides-missing plymouth-theme-spinner.noarch: E: branding-provides-missing plymouth-theme-tribar.noarch: E: branding-provides-missing Please add a provides entry similar to: 'Provides: %name-branding = %version' plymouth-theme-bgrt.noarch: E: branding-conflicts-missing plymouth-theme plymouth-theme-fade-in.noarch: E: branding-conflicts-missing plymouth-theme plymouth-theme-script.noarch: E: branding-conflicts-missing plymouth-theme plymouth-theme-solar.noarch: E: branding-conflicts-missing plymouth-theme plymouth-theme-spinfinity.noarch: E: branding-conflicts-missing plymouth-theme plymouth-theme-spinner.noarch: E: branding-conflicts-missing plymouth-theme plymouth-theme-tribar.noarch: E: branding-conflicts-missing plymouth-theme Branding packages should conflict with other flavors of the branding package by using: 'Conflicts: pkg-branding = brandingversion' and not directly by listing all the alternative brandings in it. Check time report (>1% & >0.1s): Check Duration (in s) Fraction (in %) Checked files ExtractRpm 0.5 29.3 SignatureCheck 0.3 19.6 BinariesCheck 0.3 19.5 TOTAL 1.6 100.0 25 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 28 errors, 6 warnings, 97 filtered, 224 badness; has taken 1.7 s