============================ rpmlint session starts ============================
rpmlint: 2.6.1
configuration:
    /opt/testing/lib/python3.11/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/cron-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/dbus-services.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/device-files-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/licenses.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/opensuse.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/pam-modules.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/permissions-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/pie-executables.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/polkit-rules-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/scoring.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/security.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/sudoers-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/sysctl-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/systemd-tmpfiles.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/users-groups.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/world-writable-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/zypper-plugins.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring-strict.override.toml
rpmlintrc:
    /home/abuild/rpmbuild/SOURCES/singular-rpmlintrc
checks: 41, packages: 13

libSingular-devel.armv6hl: E: zero-length /usr/include/singular/Singular/svd/libs/stdafx.h
singular.src: E: unused-rpmlintrc-filter "shlib-policy-name-error"
libSingular-4_3_2.armv6hl: W: shlib-unversioned-lib libSingular-4.3.2.p16.so
libfactory-4_3_2.armv6hl: W: shlib-unversioned-lib libfactory-4.3.2.p16.so
libomalloc-4_3_2.armv6hl: W: shlib-unversioned-lib libomalloc-4.3.2.p16.so
libpolys-4_3_2.armv6hl: W: shlib-unversioned-lib libpolys-4.3.2.p16.so
libsingular_resources-4_3_2.armv6hl: W: shlib-unversioned-lib libsingular_resources-4.3.2.p16.so
Your package matches the Shared Library Policy Naming Scheme but contains an
unversioned library. Therefore it is very unlikely that your package can be
installed in parallel to another version of this library package. Consider
moving unversioned parts into another package.

singular.armv6hl: W: package-with-huge-docs 66%
More than half the size of your package is documentation. Consider splitting
it into a -doc subpackage.

singular.armv6hl: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/ml_python/common/keyword_vector.py 644 /usr/bin/python3
This text file contains a shebang or is located in a path dedicated for
executables, but lacks the executable bits and cannot thus be executed. If the
file is meant to be an executable script, add the executable bits, otherwise
remove the shebang or move the file elsewhere.

libSingular-devel.armv6hl: E: no-binary
libfactory-devel.armv6hl: E: no-binary
libomalloc-devel.armv6hl: E: no-binary
libpolys-devel.armv6hl: E: no-binary
libsingular_resources-devel.armv6hl: E: no-binary
The package should be of the noarch architecture because it doesn't contain
any binaries.

singular.spec: W: no-%check-section
The spec file does not contain an %check section. Please check if the package
has a testsuite and what it takes to enable the testsuite as part of the
package build. If it is not possible to run it in the build environment
(OBS/koji) or no testsuite exists, then please ignore this warning. You should
not insert an empty %check section.

singular.armv6hl: E: invalid-desktopfile /usr/share/applications/Singular-manual.desktop
singular.armv6hl: E: invalid-desktopfile /usr/share/applications/Singular.desktop
The .desktop file is not valid, check with desktop-file-validate

singular.armv6hl: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/singular/emacs/.emacs-general
singular.armv6hl: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/singular/emacs/.emacs-singular
The file or directory is hidden. You should see if this is normal, and delete
it from the package if not.

libSingular-devel.armv6hl: W: description-shorter-than-summary
libomalloc-devel.armv6hl: W: description-shorter-than-summary
libsingular_resources-devel.armv6hl: W: description-shorter-than-summary
The package description should be longer than the summary.

libSingular-4_3_2.armv6hl: W: binary-or-shlib-calls-gethostbyname /usr/lib/libSingular-4.3.2.p16.so
The binary calls gethostbyname. Please port the code to use getaddrinfo.

Check time report (>1% & >0.1s):
    Check                            Duration (in s)   Fraction (in %)  Checked files
    ExtractRpm                                   2.3              34.0               
    FilesCheck                                   1.9              28.1               
    BinariesCheck                                0.8              11.6               
    BuildRootAndDateCheck                        0.4               6.5               
    BashismsCheck                                0.4               6.2               
    SignatureCheck                               0.3               4.3               
    SharedLibraryPolicyCheck                     0.3               3.9               
    FilelistCheck                                0.2               2.7               
    TOTAL                                        6.8             100.0               

 13 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 10 errors, 13 warnings, 31 filtered, 10 badness; has taken 7.0 s