============================ rpmlint session starts ============================ rpmlint: 2.6.1 configuration: /opt/testing/lib/python3.11/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/cron-whitelist.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/dbus-services.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/device-files-whitelist.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/licenses.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/opensuse.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/pam-modules.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/permissions-whitelist.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/pie-executables.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/polkit-rules-whitelist.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/scoring.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/security.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/sudoers-whitelist.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/sysctl-whitelist.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/systemd-tmpfiles.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/users-groups.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/world-writable-whitelist.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/zypper-plugins.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring-strict.override.toml rpmlintrc: /home/abuild/rpmbuild/SOURCES/Mesa-rpmlintrc checks: 41, packages: 22 Mesa-drivers.src: E: unused-rpmlintrc-filter "shlib-policy-name-error" Mesa-drivers.src: E: unused-rpmlintrc-filter "libXvMC_nouveau.*library-without-ldconfig-postin" Mesa-drivers.src: E: unused-rpmlintrc-filter "libXvMC_nouveau.*library-without-ldconfig-postun" Mesa-drivers.src: E: unused-rpmlintrc-filter "libXvMC_r600.*library-without-ldconfig-postin" Mesa-drivers.src: E: unused-rpmlintrc-filter "libXvMC_r600.*library-without-ldconfig-postun" Mesa-dri.i586: W: non-etc-or-var-file-marked-as-conffile /usr/share/drirc.d/00-mesa-defaults.conf Mesa-dri.i586: W: non-etc-or-var-file-marked-as-conffile /usr/share/drirc.d/00-radv-defaults.conf A file not in /etc or /var is marked as being a configuration file (%config). Please put your configuration files in /etc or /var. Mesa-dri-nouveau.i586: E: no-binary Mesa-libd3d-devel.i586: E: no-binary Mesa-libva.i586: E: no-binary libvdpau_d3d12.i586: E: no-binary libvdpau_nouveau.i586: E: no-binary libvdpau_r600.i586: E: no-binary libvdpau_radeonsi.i586: E: no-binary libvdpau_virtio_gpu.i586: E: no-binary libxatracker-devel.i586: E: no-binary The package should be of the noarch architecture because it doesn't contain any binaries. Mesa.spec: W: no-%check-section The spec file does not contain an %check section. Please check if the package has a testsuite and what it takes to enable the testsuite as part of the package build. If it is not possible to run it in the build environment (OBS/koji) or no testsuite exists, then please ignore this warning. You should not insert an empty %check section. Mesa-dri.i586: E: library-without-ldconfig-postun /usr/lib/libgallium-24.3.4.so Mesa-libRusticlOpenCL.i586: E: library-without-ldconfig-postun /usr/lib/libRusticlOpenCL.so.1.0.0 This package contains a library and provides no %postun scriptlet containing a call to ldconfig. Mesa-dri.i586: E: library-without-ldconfig-postin /usr/lib/libgallium-24.3.4.so Mesa-libRusticlOpenCL.i586: E: library-without-ldconfig-postin /usr/lib/libRusticlOpenCL.so.1.0.0 This package contains a library and provides no %post scriptlet containing a call to ldconfig. Mesa-drivers.src: E: invalid-spec-name The spec file name (without the .spec suffix) must match the package name ('Name:' tag). Mesa-dri.i586: E: explicit-lib-dependency libvulkan1 Mesa-libOpenCL.i586: E: explicit-lib-dependency libclc(llvm19) Mesa-libRusticlOpenCL.i586: E: explicit-lib-dependency libclc(llvm19) You must let rpm find the library dependencies by itself. Do not put unneeded explicit Requires: tags. Mesa-vulkan-overlay.i586: E: env-script-interpreter (Badness: 9) /usr/bin/mesa-overlay-control.py /usr/bin/env python3 This script uses 'env' as an interpreter. For the rpm runtime dependency detection to work, the shebang #!/usr/bin/env needs to be patched into #!/usr/bin/ otherwise the package dependency generator merely adds a dependency on /usr/bin/env rather than the actual interpreter /usr/bin/. Alternatively, if the file should not be executed, then ensure that it is not marked as executable or don't install it in a path that is reserved for executables. Mesa-libOpenCL.i586: E: devel-file-in-non-devel-package (Badness: 50) /usr/lib/libMesaOpenCL.so Mesa-libRusticlOpenCL.i586: E: devel-file-in-non-devel-package (Badness: 50) /usr/lib/libRusticlOpenCL.so libvdpau_d3d12.i586: E: devel-file-in-non-devel-package (Badness: 50) /usr/lib/vdpau/libvdpau_d3d12.so libvdpau_nouveau.i586: E: devel-file-in-non-devel-package (Badness: 50) /usr/lib/vdpau/libvdpau_nouveau.so libvdpau_r600.i586: E: devel-file-in-non-devel-package (Badness: 50) /usr/lib/vdpau/libvdpau_r600.so libvdpau_radeonsi.i586: E: devel-file-in-non-devel-package (Badness: 50) /usr/lib/vdpau/libvdpau_radeonsi.so libvdpau_virtio_gpu.i586: E: devel-file-in-non-devel-package (Badness: 50) /usr/lib/vdpau/libvdpau_virtio_gpu.so A file that is needed only e.g. when developing or building software is included in a non-devel package. These files should go in devel packages. Check time report (>1% & >0.1s): Check Duration (in s) Fraction (in %) Checked files ExtractRpm 3.6 53.8 BinariesCheck 1.4 20.9 SharedLibraryPolicyCheck 0.6 9.2 SignatureCheck 0.6 8.3 BuildRootAndDateCheck 0.2 2.8 SpecCheck 0.2 2.3 TagsCheck 0.1 1.9 TOTAL 6.7 100.0 22 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 30 errors, 3 warnings, 110 filtered, 381 badness; has taken 6.8 s