============================ rpmlint session starts ============================
rpmlint: 2.6.1
configuration:
    /opt/testing/lib64/python3.11/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/cron-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/dbus-services.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/device-files-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/licenses.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/opensuse.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/pam-modules.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/permissions-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/pie-executables.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/polkit-rules-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/scoring.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/security.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/sudoers-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/sysctl-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/systemd-tmpfiles.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/users-groups.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/world-writable-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/zypper-plugins.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring-strict.override.toml
checks: 41, packages: 2

enlightenment-branding-openSUSE.x86_64: E: suse-zypp-packageand packageand(enlightenment:branding-openSUSE)
The 'packageand(package1:package2)' syntax is obsolete, please use boolean
dependencies like: 'Supplements: (package1 and package2)'

enlightenment-branding-openSUSE.x86_64: E: suse-zypp-otherproviders otherproviders(e17-branding)
enlightenment-branding-openSUSE.x86_64: E: suse-zypp-otherproviders otherproviders(enlightenment-branding)
The 'otherproviders(symbol)' syntax is obsolete, it is not needed and you can
use the 'symbol' directly: 'Conflicts: symbol'

enlightenment-branding-openSUSE.x86_64: W: obsolete-not-provided e-branding-openSUSE
enlightenment-branding-openSUSE.x86_64: W: obsolete-not-provided e17-branding-openSUSE
If a package is obsoleted by a compatible replacement, the obsoleted package
should also be provided in order to not cause unnecessary dependency breakage.
If the obsoleting package is not a compatible replacement for the old one,
leave out the Provides.

enlightenment-branding-openSUSE.spec: W: no-%check-section
The spec file does not contain an %check section. Please check if the package
has a testsuite and what it takes to enable the testsuite as part of the
package build. If it is not possible to run it in the build environment
(OBS/koji) or no testsuite exists, then please ignore this warning. You should
not insert an empty %check section.

enlightenment-branding-openSUSE.x86_64: E: branding-supplements-missing (enlightenment and branding-openSUSE)
Branding packages should provide a supplement in the form: 'Supplements:
(basepackage and branding-<flavor>)'

enlightenment-branding-openSUSE.x86_64: W: branding-excessive-recommends enlightenment-theme-Flat
enlightenment-branding-openSUSE.x86_64: W: branding-excessive-recommends enlightenment-theme-dark
enlightenment-branding-openSUSE.x86_64: W: branding-excessive-recommends enlightenment-theme-openSUSE-ice
enlightenment-branding-openSUSE.x86_64: W: branding-excessive-recommends enlightenment-theme-openSUSE-neon
enlightenment-branding-openSUSE.x86_64: W: branding-excessive-recommends enlightenment-theme-openSUSE-oliveleaf
enlightenment-branding-openSUSE.x86_64: W: branding-excessive-recommends terminology
Branding package should not have additional Recommends, please verify if they
really make sense.

enlightenment-branding-openSUSE.x86_64: E: branding-conflicts-missing enlightenment-branding
Branding packages should conflict with other flavors of the branding package
by using: 'Conflicts: pkg-branding = brandingversion' and not directly by
listing all the alternative brandings in it.

Check time report (>1% & >0.1s):
    Check                            Duration (in s)   Fraction (in %)  Checked files
    TOTAL                                        0.1             100.0               

 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 5 errors, 9 warnings, 5 filtered, 5 badness; has taken 0.1 s