============================ rpmlint session starts ============================
rpmlint: 2.6.1
configuration:
    /opt/testing/lib/python3.11/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/cron-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/dbus-services.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/device-files-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/licenses.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/opensuse.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/pam-modules.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/permissions-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/pie-executables.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/polkit-rules-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/scoring.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/security.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/sudoers-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/sysctl-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/systemd-tmpfiles.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/users-groups.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/world-writable-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/zypper-plugins.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring-strict.override.toml
rpmlintrc:
    /home/abuild/rpmbuild/SOURCES/sblim-sfcb-rpmlintrc
checks: 41, packages: 2

sblim-sfcb.armv6hl: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/sfcb/getSchema.sh
This text file has executable bits set or is located in a path dedicated for
executables, but lacks a shebang and cannot thus be executed. If the file is
meant to be an executable script, add the shebang, otherwise remove the
executable bits or move the file elsewhere.

sblim-sfcb.spec:19: E: obsolete-suse-version-check 1140
sblim-sfcb.spec:100: E: obsolete-suse-version-check 1030
sblim-sfcb.spec:119: E: obsolete-suse-version-check 1140
sblim-sfcb.spec:132: E: obsolete-suse-version-check 1120
The specfile contains a comparison of %suse_version against a suse release
that is no longer in maintenance. Consider removing obsolete parts of your
spec file to make it more readable.

sblim-sfcb.armv6hl: W: non-etc-or-var-file-marked-as-conffile /usr/lib/pam.d/sfcb
A file not in /etc or /var is marked as being a configuration file (%config).
Please put your configuration files in /etc or /var.

sblim-sfcb.spec: W: no-%check-section
The spec file does not contain an %check section. Please check if the package
has a testsuite and what it takes to enable the testsuite as part of the
package build. If it is not possible to run it in the build environment
(OBS/koji) or no testsuite exists, then please ignore this warning. You should
not insert an empty %check section.

sblim-sfcb.spec:166: W: macro-in-comment %{SOURCE1}
sblim-sfcb.spec:205: W: macro-in-comment %doc
sblim-sfcb.spec:313: W: macro-in-comment %{_datadir}
sblim-sfcb.spec:313: W: macro-in-comment %{_sysconfdir}
There is a unescaped macro after a shell style comment in the specfile. Macros
are expanded everywhere, so check if it can cause a problem in this case and
escape the macro with another leading % if appropriate.

sblim-sfcb.armv6hl: W: files-duplicate /var/lib/sfcb/stage/default.reg /usr/share/sfcb/default.reg:/var/lib/sfcb/registration/providerRegister
Your package contains duplicated files that are not hard- or symlinks. You
should use the %fdupes macro to link the files to one.

Check time report (>1% & >0.1s):
    Check                            Duration (in s)   Fraction (in %)  Checked files
    BashismsCheck                                1.1              55.5               
    BinariesCheck                                0.4              21.7               
    ExtractRpm                                   0.3              15.3               
    TOTAL                                        2.0             100.0               

 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 5 errors, 7 warnings, 36 filtered, 5 badness; has taken 2.0 s