============================ rpmlint session starts ============================ rpmlint: 2.7.0 configuration: /opt/testing/lib/python3.13/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/cron-whitelist.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/dbus-services.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/device-files-whitelist.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/licenses.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/opensuse.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/pam-modules.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/permissions-whitelist.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/pie-executables.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/polkit-rules-whitelist.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/scoring.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/security.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/sudoers-whitelist.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/sysctl-whitelist.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/systemd-tmpfiles.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/users-groups.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/world-writable-whitelist.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/zypper-plugins.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring-strict.override.toml checks: 41, packages: 4 plasma6-branding-openSUSE.noarch: W: obsolete-not-provided plasma5-workspace-branding-openSUSE plasma6-theme-openSUSE.noarch: W: obsolete-not-provided plasma5-theme-openSUSE If a package is obsoleted by a compatible replacement, the obsoleted package should also be provided in order to not cause unnecessary dependency breakage. If the obsoleting package is not a compatible replacement for the old one, leave out the Provides. plasma6-sddm-theme-openSUSE.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/sddm/themes/breeze-openSUSE/Messages.sh 644 /usr/bin/env bash This text file contains a shebang or is located in a path dedicated for executables, but lacks the executable bits and cannot thus be executed. If the file is meant to be an executable script, add the executable bits, otherwise remove the shebang or move the file elsewhere. plasma6-openSUSE.src: E: no-description-tag The description of the package is empty or missing. plasma6-openSUSE.spec: W: no-%check-section The spec file does not contain an %check section. Please check if the package has a testsuite and what it takes to enable the testsuite as part of the package build. If it is not possible to run it in the build environment (OBS/koji) or no testsuite exists, then please ignore this warning. You should not insert an empty %check section. plasma6-sddm-theme-openSUSE.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/sddm/themes/breeze-openSUSE/faces/.face.icon The file or directory is hidden. You should see if this is normal, and delete it from the package if not. plasma6-branding-openSUSE.noarch: E: branding-supplements-missing (plasma6 and branding-openSUSE) plasma6-sddm-theme-openSUSE.noarch: E: branding-supplements-missing (plasma6-sddm and theme-openSUSE) plasma6-theme-openSUSE.noarch: E: branding-supplements-missing (plasma6 and theme-openSUSE) Branding packages should provide a supplement in the form: 'Supplements: (basepackage and branding-)' plasma6-branding-openSUSE.noarch: E: branding-provides-missing plasma6-sddm-theme-openSUSE.noarch: E: branding-provides-missing plasma6-theme-openSUSE.noarch: E: branding-provides-missing Please add a provides entry similar to: 'Provides: %name-branding = %version' plasma6-branding-openSUSE.noarch: E: branding-conflicts-missing plasma6-branding plasma6-sddm-theme-openSUSE.noarch: E: branding-conflicts-missing plasma6-sddm-theme plasma6-theme-openSUSE.noarch: E: branding-conflicts-missing plasma6-theme Branding packages should conflict with other flavors of the branding package by using: 'Conflicts: pkg-branding = brandingversion' and not directly by listing all the alternative brandings in it. Check time report (>1% & >0.1s): Check Duration (in s) Fraction (in %) Checked files ExtractRpm 0.2 54.0 TOTAL 0.4 100.0 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 11 errors, 4 warnings, 28 filtered, 11 badness; has taken 0.4 s