============================ rpmlint session starts ============================
rpmlint: 2.7.0
configuration:
    /opt/testing/lib/python3.13/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/cron-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/dbus-services.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/device-files-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/licenses.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/opensuse.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/pam-modules.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/permissions-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/pie-executables.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/polkit-rules-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/scoring.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/security.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/sudoers-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/sysctl-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/systemd-tmpfiles.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/users-groups.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/world-writable-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/zypper-plugins.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring-strict.override.toml
checks: 41, packages: 2

cross-m68k-binutils.armv6hl: E: zero-length /usr/m68k-suse-linux/lib/ldscripts/stamp
binutils.spec:696: W: shared-dir-glob-in-files %{_bindir}/*
The %files section contains "%{_bindir}/*", "%{_datadir}/*", "%{_docdir}/*",
"%{_includedir}/*" or "%{_mandir}/*".  These can lead to packagers not
noticing when upstream adds new and possibly conflicting files in these
directories. Therefore, files in these directories should be explicitely
listed like "%{_bindir}/foobar" or "%{_includedir}/foobar.h".

binutils.spec:180: E: obsolete-suse-version-check 1310
The specfile contains a comparison of %suse_version against a suse release
that is no longer in maintenance. Consider removing obsolete parts of your
spec file to make it more readable.

binutils.spec:403: W: macro-in-comment %{suse_version}
binutils.spec:405: W: macro-in-comment %endif
There is a unescaped macro after a shell style comment in the specfile. Macros
are expanded everywhere, so check if it can cause a problem in this case and
escape the macro with another leading % if appropriate.

cross-m68k-binutils.src: E: invalid-spec-name
The spec file name (without the .spec suffix) must match the package name
('Name:' tag).

cross-m68k-binutils.armv6hl: E: filelist-forbidden-fhs23 /usr/m68k-suse-linux
File violates FHS 2.3.

Check time report (>1% & >0.1s):
    Check                            Duration (in s)   Fraction (in %)  Checked files
    ExtractRpm                                   3.1              79.7               
    BinariesCheck                                0.4              10.3               
    SignatureCheck                               0.2               4.8               
    SpecCheck                                    0.1               2.7               
    TOTAL                                        3.9             100.0               

 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 4 errors, 3 warnings, 27 filtered, 4 badness; has taken 3.9 s