canna-libs.x86_64: I: binary-or-shlib-calls-gethostbyname /usr/lib64/libRKC.so.1.2
canna-libs.x86_64: I: binary-or-shlib-calls-gethostbyname /usr/lib64/libRKC16.so.1.2
canna-libs.x86_64: I: binary-or-shlib-calls-gethostbyname /usr/lib64/libcanna.so.1.2
canna-libs.x86_64: I: binary-or-shlib-calls-gethostbyname /usr/lib64/libcanna16.so.1.2
canna.x86_64: I: binary-or-shlib-calls-gethostbyname /usr/sbin/cannaserver
The binary calls gethostbyname(). Please port the code to use getaddrinfo().

canna-devel.x86_64: W: description-shorter-than-summary
canna-libs.x86_64: W: description-shorter-than-summary
The package description should be longer than the summary. be a bit more
verbose, please.

canna.src:270: W: macro-in-comment %config
canna.src:112: W: macro-in-comment %description
canna.src:126: W: macro-in-comment %description
canna.src:76: W: macro-in-comment %description
There is a unescaped macro after a shell style comment in the specfile. Macros
are expanded everywhere, so check if it can cause a problem in this case and
escape the macro with another leading % if appropriate.

canna.x86_64: W: missing-call-to-setgroups-before-setuid /usr/bin/canuum
This executable is calling setuid and setgid without setgroups or initgroups.
There is a high probability this means it didn't relinquish all groups, and
this would be a potential security issue to be fixed. Seek POS36-C on the web
for details about the problem.

canna-devel.x86_64: W: no-version-in-last-changelog
canna-libs.x86_64: W: no-version-in-last-changelog
canna.src: W: no-version-in-last-changelog
canna.x86_64: W: no-version-in-last-changelog
The latest changelog entry doesn't contain a version. Please insert the
version that is coherent with the version of the package and rebuild it.

canna.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/hosts.canna/hosts.canna
A non-executable file in your package is being installed in /etc, but is not a
configuration file. All non-executable files in /etc should be configuration
files. Mark the file as %config in the spec file.

canna.x86_64: W: package-with-huge-docs  69%
More than half the size of your package is documentation. Consider splitting
it into a -doc subpackage.

canna.x86_64: W: postin-without-tmpfile-creation /usr/lib/tmpfiles.d/canna-tmpfiles.conf
Please use the %tmpfiles_create macro in %post for each of your tmpfiles.d
files

canna.x86_64: W: script-without-shebang /usr/bin/dpbindic
canna.x86_64: W: script-without-shebang /usr/bin/mkbindic
canna.x86_64: W: script-without-shebang /usr/bin/mkromdic
This text file has executable bits set or is located in a path dedicated for
executables, but lacks a shebang and cannot thus be executed.  If the file is
meant to be an executable script, add the shebang, otherwise remove the
executable bits or move the file elsewhere.

canna-libs.x86_64: W: shlib-policy-missing-suffix
Your package containing shared libraries does not end in a digit and should
probably be split.

canna.x86_64: W: suse-missing-rclink canna
The package contains an init script or systemd service file but lacks the
symlink /usr/sbin/rcFOO -> /usr/sbin/service

canna.x86_64: W: tmpfile-not-in-filelist /run/canna
please add the specified file to your %files section as %ghost so users can
easily query who created the file, it gets uninstalled on package removal and
finally other rpmlint checks see it

canna.x86_64: E: devel-file-in-non-devel-package (Badness: 50) /var/lib/canna/sample/src/is.c
A file that is needed only e.g. when developing or building software is
included in a non-devel package. These files should go in devel packages.

4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 20 warnings.