eid-mw.src:21: W: macro-in-comment %{revision}
eid-mw.src:21: W: macro-in-comment %{version}
eid-mw.src:21: W: macro-in-comment %{version}
There is a unescaped macro after a shell style comment in the specfile. Macros
are expanded everywhere, so check if it can cause a problem in this case and
escape the macro with another leading % if appropriate.

eid-mw-devel.x86_64: W: no-version-in-last-changelog
eid-mw-firefox.x86_64: W: no-version-in-last-changelog
eid-mw-libs.x86_64: W: no-version-in-last-changelog
eid-mw.src: W: no-version-in-last-changelog
eid-mw.x86_64: W: no-version-in-last-changelog
eid-viewer.x86_64: W: no-version-in-last-changelog
The latest changelog entry doesn't contain a version. Please insert the
version that is coherent with the version of the package and rebuild it.

eid-viewer.x86_64: W: pem-certificate /usr/share/eid-mw/trustdir/belgiumrca2.pem
eid-viewer.x86_64: W: pem-certificate /usr/share/eid-mw/trustdir/belgiumrca3.pem
eid-viewer.x86_64: W: pem-certificate /usr/share/eid-mw/trustdir/belgiumrca4.pem
eid-viewer.x86_64: W: pem-certificate /usr/share/eid-mw/trustdir/belgiumrca6.pem
Shipping a PEM certificate is likely wrong. If used for the default
configuration, this is insecure ( since the certificate is public ). If this
is used for validation, ie a CA certificate store, then this must be kept up
to date due to CA compromise. The only valid reason is for testing purpose, so
ignore this warning if this is the case.

eid-mw-libs.x86_64: W: shlib-policy-missing-suffix
Your package containing shared libraries does not end in a digit and should
probably be split.

6 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 14 warnings.