============================ rpmlint session starts ============================
rpmlint: 2.7.0
configuration:
    /opt/testing/lib64/python3.13/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/cron-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/dbus-services.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/device-files-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/licenses.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/opensuse.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/pam-modules.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/permissions-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/pie-executables.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/polkit-rules-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/scoring.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/security.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/sudoers-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/sysctl-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/systemd-tmpfiles.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/users-groups.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/world-writable-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/zypper-plugins.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring-strict.override.toml
rpmlintrc:
    /home/abuild/rpmbuild/SOURCES/drbd-utils.rpmlintrc
checks: 41, packages: 3

drbd-selinux.x86_64: W: zero-perms-ghost Suggestion: "%ghost %attr(0644,root,root) /var/lib/selinux/targeted/active/modules/200/drbd"
Your package contains a file with no permissions. This is usually an error
because the file won't be accessible by any user. You should check the file
permissions and ensure that are correct or fix it using "%attr" macro in
%files section.
http://ftp.rpm.org/max-rpm/s1-rpm-anywhere-specifying-file-attributes.html

drbd-utils.x86_64: W: tmpfile-not-in-filelist /run/drbd
drbd-utils.x86_64: W: tmpfile-not-in-filelist /run/drbd/lock
Please add the specified file to your %files section as %ghost so users can
easily query who created the file, it gets uninstalled on package removal and
finally other rpmlint checks see it.

drbd-utils.x86_64: W: post-without-tmpfile-creation /usr/lib/tmpfiles.d/drbd.conf
Please use the %tmpfiles_create macro in %post for each of your tmpfiles.d
files if you expect this file or directory to be available after package
installation (and before reboot).

drbd-utils.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/xen/scripts/block-drbd
A non-executable file in your package is being installed in /etc, but is not a
configuration file. All non-executable files in /etc should be configuration
files. Mark the file as %config in the spec file.

drbd-selinux.x86_64: E: no-binary
The package should be of the noarch architecture because it doesn't contain
any binaries.

drbd-utils.spec: W: no-%check-section
The spec file does not contain an %check section. Please check if the package
has a testsuite and what it takes to enable the testsuite as part of the
package build. If it is not possible to run it in the build environment
(OBS/koji) or no testsuite exists, then please ignore this warning. You should
not insert an empty %check section.

drbd-utils.spec:23: W: macro-in-comment %{libdir}
There is a unescaped macro after a shell style comment in the specfile. Macros
are expanded everywhere, so check if it can cause a problem in this case and
escape the macro with another leading % if appropriate.

drbd-utils.x86_64: W: empty-%posttrans
drbd-utils.x86_64: W: binary-or-shlib-calls-gethostbyname /usr/sbin/drbdadm
drbd-utils.x86_64: W: binary-or-shlib-calls-gethostbyname /usr/sbin/drbdsetup
The binary calls gethostbyname. Please port the code to use getaddrinfo.

Check time report (>1% & >0.1s):
    Check                            Duration (in s)   Fraction (in %)  Checked files
    BashismsCheck                                0.2              33.6               
    ExtractRpm                                   0.2              31.9               
    TOTAL                                        0.6             100.0               

 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 10 warnings, 34 filtered, 1 badness; has taken 0.6 s