============================ rpmlint session starts ============================
rpmlint: 2.8.0
configuration:
    /opt/testing/lib/python3.13/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/cron-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/dbus-services.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/device-files-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/licenses.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/opensuse.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/pam-modules.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/permissions-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/pie-executables.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/polkit-rules-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/scoring.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/security.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/sudoers-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/sysctl-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/systemd-tmpfiles.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/users-groups.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/world-writable-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/zypper-plugins.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring-strict.override.toml
checks: 42, packages: 6

binutils.i586: W: zero-perms-ghost Suggestion: "%ghost %attr(0644,root,root) /etc/alternatives/ld"
Your package contains a file with no permissions. This is usually an error
because the file won't be accessible by any user. You should check the file
permissions and ensure that are correct or fix it using "%attr" macro in
%files section.
http://ftp.rpm.org/max-rpm/s1-rpm-anywhere-specifying-file-attributes.html

binutils.i586: E: update-alternatives-postun-call-missing
The package does not call update-alternatives --remove in postun phase to
remove all the configuration for each individual --install binary that was
done in postun.

binutils.spec:727: W: shared-dir-glob-in-files %{_bindir}/*
The %files section contains "%{_bindir}/*", "%{_datadir}/*", "%{_docdir}/*",
"%{_includedir}/*" or "%{_mandir}/*".  These can lead to packagers not
noticing when upstream adds new and possibly conflicting files in these
directories. Therefore, files in these directories should be explicitely
listed like "%{_bindir}/foobar" or "%{_includedir}/foobar.h".

binutils.i586: I: package-supports-update-alternatives
binutils.spec:193: E: obsolete-suse-version-check 1310
The specfile contains a comparison of %suse_version against a suse release
that is no longer in maintenance. Consider removing obsolete parts of your
spec file to make it more readable.

binutils.i586: W: name-repeated-in-summary Binutils
binutils.src: W: name-repeated-in-summary Binutils
The name of the package is repeated in its summary. Make the summary brief and
to the point without including redundant information in it.

gprofng.i586: E: missing-call-to-setgroups-before-setuid /usr/lib/gprofng/libgp-collector.so
This executable is calling setuid and setgid without setgroups or initgroups.
This means it didn't relinquish all groups, and this would be a potential
security issue.

binutils.spec:194: W: macro-in-comment %ix86
binutils.spec:194: W: macro-in-comment %arm
binutils.spec:194: W: macro-in-comment %x86_64
binutils.spec:194: W: macro-in-comment %sparc
binutils.spec:430: W: macro-in-comment %{suse_version}
binutils.spec:432: W: macro-in-comment %endif
There is a unescaped macro after a shell style comment in the specfile. Macros
are expanded everywhere, so check if it can cause a problem in this case and
escape the macro with another leading % if appropriate.

binutils.i586: E: filelist-forbidden-fhs23 /usr/i586-suse-linux
File violates FHS 2.3.

binutils.i586: E: env-script-interpreter (Badness: 9) /usr/bin/gprofng-display-html /usr/bin/env perl
This script uses 'env' as an interpreter. For the rpm runtime dependency
detection to work, the shebang #!/usr/bin/env <interpreter>  needs to be
patched into #!/usr/bin/<interpreter>  otherwise the package dependency
generator merely adds a dependency on /usr/bin/env rather than the actual
interpreter /usr/bin/<interpreter>.  Alternatively, if the file should not be
executed, then ensure that it is not marked as executable or don't install it
in a path that is reserved for executables.

Check time report (>1% & >0.1s):
    Check                            Duration (in s)   Fraction (in %)  Checked files
    ExtractRpm                                   6.5              44.2               
    SUIDPermissionsCheck                         2.6              17.8               
    BinariesCheck                                2.0              13.8               
    FilesCheck                                   1.0               6.7               
    BashismsCheck                                0.7               4.7               
    BuildRootAndDateCheck                        0.5               3.4               
    SpecCheck                                    0.4               2.7               
    FilelistCheck                                0.3               2.3               
    SignatureCheck                               0.3               1.8               
    TOTAL                                       14.7             100.0               

 6 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 5 errors, 10 warnings, 586 filtered, 13 badness; has taken 14.9 s