============================ rpmlint session starts ============================ rpmlint: 2.8.0 configuration: /opt/testing/lib/python3.13/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/cron-whitelist.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/dbus-services.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/device-files-whitelist.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/licenses.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/opensuse.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/pam-modules.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/permissions-whitelist.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/pie-executables.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/polkit-rules-whitelist.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/scoring.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/security.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/sudoers-whitelist.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/sysctl-whitelist.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/systemd-tmpfiles.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/users-groups.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/world-writable-whitelist.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/zypper-plugins.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring-strict.override.toml rpmlintrc: /home/abuild/rpmbuild/SOURCES/ffmpeg-8-rpmlintrc checks: 41, packages: 16 libavcodec62.i586: E: shlib-with-non-pic-code /usr/lib/libavcodec.so.62.11.100 libavfilter11.i586: E: shlib-with-non-pic-code /usr/lib/libavfilter.so.11.4.100 libavutil60.i586: E: shlib-with-non-pic-code /usr/lib/libavutil.so.60.8.100 libswresample6.i586: E: shlib-with-non-pic-code /usr/lib/libswresample.so.6.1.100 libswscale9.i586: E: shlib-with-non-pic-code /usr/lib/libswscale.so.9.1.100 The listed shared libraries contain object code that was compiled without -fPIC. All object code in shared libraries should be recompiled separately from the static libraries with the -fPIC option. Use the ``eu-findtextrel'' command on a library with debugging symbols to list code compiled without -fPIC. Another common mistake that causes this problem is linking with ``gcc -Wl,-shared'' instead of ``gcc -shared''. ffmpeg-8.i586: W: package-with-huge-docs 63% More than half the size of your package is documentation. Consider splitting it into a -doc subpackage. ffmpeg-8-libavcodec-devel.i586: E: no-binary ffmpeg-8-libavdevice-devel.i586: E: no-binary ffmpeg-8-libavfilter-devel.i586: E: no-binary ffmpeg-8-libavformat-devel.i586: E: no-binary ffmpeg-8-libavutil-devel.i586: E: no-binary ffmpeg-8-libswresample-devel.i586: E: no-binary ffmpeg-8-libswscale-devel.i586: E: no-binary The package should be of the noarch architecture because it doesn't contain any binaries. ffmpeg-8.spec: W: no-%check-section The spec file does not contain an %check section. Please check if the package has a testsuite and what it takes to enable the testsuite as part of the package build. If it is not possible to run it in the build environment (OBS/koji) or no testsuite exists, then please ignore this warning. You should not insert an empty %check section. ffmpeg-8.spec:772: W: macro-in-comment %flavor There is a unescaped macro after a shell style comment in the specfile. Macros are expanded everywhere, so check if it can cause a problem in this case and escape the macro with another leading % if appropriate. Check time report (>1% & >0.1s): Check Duration (in s) Fraction (in %) Checked files ExtractRpm 2.9 56.1 BinariesCheck 0.9 17.2 SharedLibraryPolicyCheck 0.3 6.5 SignatureCheck 0.3 6.0 FilesCheck 0.2 3.9 SpecCheck 0.1 2.5 TagsCheck 0.1 2.2 TOTAL 5.1 100.0 16 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 12 errors, 3 warnings, 111 filtered, 12 badness; has taken 5.2 s