============================ rpmlint session starts ============================
rpmlint: 2.8.0
configuration:
    /opt/testing/lib64/python3.13/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/cron-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/dbus-services.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/device-files-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/licenses.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/opensuse.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/pam-modules.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/permissions-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/pie-executables.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/polkit-rules-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/scoring.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/security.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/sudoers-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/sysctl-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/systemd-tmpfiles.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/users-groups.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/world-writable-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/zypper-plugins.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring-strict.override.toml
checks: 42, packages: 9

QR-Code-generator-javadoc.aarch64: W: package-with-huge-docs 99%
More than half the size of your package is documentation. Consider splitting
it into a -doc subpackage.

QR-Code-generator-java.aarch64: E: no-binary
QR-Code-generator-javadoc.aarch64: E: no-binary
python311-QR-Code-generator.aarch64: E: no-binary
python312-QR-Code-generator.aarch64: E: no-binary
python313-QR-Code-generator.aarch64: E: no-binary
The package should be of the noarch architecture because it doesn't contain
any binaries.

QR-Code-generator.spec: W: no-%check-section
The spec file does not contain an %check section. Please check if the package
has a testsuite and what it takes to enable the testsuite as part of the
package build. If it is not possible to run it in the build environment
(OBS/koji) or no testsuite exists, then please ignore this warning. You should
not insert an empty %check section.

QR-Code-generator.spec:56: W: macro-in-comment %python_subpackage
There is a unescaped macro after a shell style comment in the specfile. Macros
are expanded everywhere, so check if it can cause a problem in this case and
escape the macro with another leading % if appropriate.

QR-Code-generator-devel.aarch64: W: files-duplicate /usr/lib64/cmake/qrcodegencpp/qrcodegencpp-config-version.cmake /usr/lib64/cmake/qrcodegen/qrcodegen-config-version.cmake
QR-Code-generator-devel.aarch64: W: files-duplicate /usr/share/licenses/QR-Code-generator-devel/Readme.markdown /usr/share/doc/packages/QR-Code-generator-devel/Readme.markdown
Your package contains duplicated files that are not hard- or symlinks. You
should use the %fdupes macro to link the files to one.

Check time report (>1% & >0.1s):
    Check                            Duration (in s)   Fraction (in %)  Checked files
    ExtractRpm                                   0.4              51.5               
    SignatureCheck                               0.1              15.5               
    TOTAL                                        0.8             100.0               

 9 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 5 errors, 5 warnings, 38 filtered, 5 badness; has taken 0.8 s