============================ rpmlint session starts ============================
rpmlint: 2.8.0
configuration:
    /opt/testing/lib64/python3.13/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/cron-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/dbus-services.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/device-files-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/licenses.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/opensuse.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/pam-modules.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/permissions-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/pie-executables.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/polkit-rules-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/scoring.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/security.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/sudoers-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/sysctl-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/systemd-tmpfiles.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/users-groups.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/world-writable-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/zypper-plugins.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring-strict.override.toml
rpmlintrc:
    /home/abuild/rpmbuild/SOURCES/gdb-rpmlintrc
checks: 42, packages: 2

gdb-testresults.nosrc: E: unused-rpmlintrc-filter "gdb-testresults.*file-contains-buildroot"
gdb-testresults.nosrc: E: unused-rpmlintrc-filter "gdbserver.*shlib-policy-name-error.*libinproctrace"
gdb-testresults.aarch64: W: package-with-huge-docs 100%
More than half the size of your package is documentation. Consider splitting
it into a -doc subpackage.

gdb.spec:99: E: obsolete-suse-version-check 1200
gdb.spec:506: E: obsolete-suse-version-check 1200
gdb.spec:513: E: obsolete-suse-version-check 1200
The specfile contains a comparison of %suse_version against a suse release
that is no longer in maintenance. Consider removing obsolete parts of your
spec file to make it more readable.

gdb-testresults.aarch64: E: no-binary
The package should be of the noarch architecture because it doesn't contain
any binaries.

gdb.spec:1018: W: macro-in-comment %check
gdb.spec:1018: W: macro-in-comment %clean
There is a unescaped macro after a shell style comment in the specfile. Macros
are expanded everywhere, so check if it can cause a problem in this case and
escape the macro with another leading % if appropriate.

gdb-testresults.nosrc: E: invalid-spec-name
The spec file name (without the .spec suffix) must match the package name
('Name:' tag).

Check time report (>1% & >0.1s):
    Check                            Duration (in s)   Fraction (in %)  Checked files
    ExtractRpm                                   1.3              51.8               
    BuildRootAndDateCheck                        0.9              36.2               
    FilesCheck                                   0.1               4.5               
    TOTAL                                        2.5             100.0               

 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 7 errors, 3 warnings, 8 filtered, 7 badness; has taken 2.6 s