============================ rpmlint session starts ============================ rpmlint: 2.8.0 configuration: /opt/testing/lib64/python3.13/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/cron-whitelist.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/dbus-services.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/device-files-whitelist.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/licenses.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/opensuse.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/pam-modules.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/permissions-whitelist.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/pie-executables.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/polkit-rules-whitelist.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/scoring.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/security.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/sudoers-whitelist.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/sysctl-whitelist.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/systemd-tmpfiles.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/users-groups.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/world-writable-whitelist.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/zypper-plugins.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring-strict.override.toml checks: 41, packages: 2 solfege.spec:38: W: suse-update-desktop-file-deprecated %suse_update_desktop_file is deprecated The usage of %suse_update_desktop_file is deprecated and changes should be migrated to the upstream. Please check the build log for details. solfege.aarch64: E: spurious-executable-perm (Badness: 50) /usr/share/doc/packages/solfege/changelog The file is installed with executable permissions, but was identified as one that probably should not be executable. Verify if the executable bits are desired, and remove if not. solfege.spec:121: W: shared-dir-glob-in-files %{_bindir}/* The %files section contains "%{_bindir}/*", "%{_datadir}/*", "%{_docdir}/*", "%{_includedir}/*" or "%{_mandir}/*". These can lead to packagers not noticing when upstream adds new and possibly conflicting files in these directories. Therefore, files in these directories should be explicitely listed like "%{_bindir}/foobar" or "%{_includedir}/foobar.h". solfege.aarch64: E: no-binary The package should be of the noarch architecture because it doesn't contain any binaries. solfege.spec: W: no-%check-section The spec file does not contain an %check section. Please check if the package has a testsuite and what it takes to enable the testsuite as part of the package build. If it is not possible to run it in the build environment (OBS/koji) or no testsuite exists, then please ignore this warning. You should not insert an empty %check section. solfege.spec: W: depscript-without-disabling-depgen In some common rpm configurations/versions, defining __find_provides and/or __find_requires has no effect if rpm's internal dependency generator has not been disabled for the build. %define _use_internal_dependency_generator to 0 to disable it in the specfile, or don't define __find_provides/requires. Check time report (>1% & >0.1s): Check Duration (in s) Fraction (in %) Checked files ExtractRpm 0.5 53.9 SUIDPermissionsCheck 0.1 13.1 TOTAL 0.9 100.0 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 4 warnings, 4 filtered, 51 badness; has taken 1.0 s