============================ rpmlint session starts ============================ rpmlint: 2.8.0 configuration: /opt/testing/lib/python3.13/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/cron-whitelist.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/dbus-services.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/device-files-whitelist.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/licenses.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/opensuse.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/pam-modules.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/permissions-whitelist.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/pie-executables.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/polkit-rules-whitelist.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/scoring.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/security.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/sudoers-whitelist.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/sysctl-whitelist.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/systemd-tmpfiles.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/users-groups.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/world-writable-whitelist.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/zypper-plugins.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring-strict.override.toml rpmlintrc: /home/abuild/rpmbuild/SOURCES/Mesa-rpmlintrc checks: 42, packages: 14 Mesa.src: E: unused-rpmlintrc-filter "shlib-policy-name-error" Mesa.src: E: unused-rpmlintrc-filter "Mesa-libOpenCL.*library-without-ldconfig-postin" Mesa.src: E: unused-rpmlintrc-filter "Mesa-libOpenCL.*library-without-ldconfig-postun" Mesa.src: E: unused-rpmlintrc-filter "libXvMC_nouveau.*library-without-ldconfig-postin" Mesa.src: E: unused-rpmlintrc-filter "libXvMC_nouveau.*library-without-ldconfig-postun" Mesa.src: E: unused-rpmlintrc-filter "libXvMC_r600.*library-without-ldconfig-postin" Mesa.src: E: unused-rpmlintrc-filter "libXvMC_r600.*library-without-ldconfig-postun" Mesa.armv7hl: W: obsolete-not-provided Mesa-gallium Mesa.armv7hl: W: obsolete-not-provided Mesa-libOpenCL Mesa.armv7hl: W: obsolete-not-provided Mesa-libd3d Mesa.armv7hl: W: obsolete-not-provided libxatracker2 Mesa-devel.armv7hl: W: obsolete-not-provided Mesa-libd3d-devel Mesa-devel.armv7hl: W: obsolete-not-provided libxatracker-devel If a package is obsoleted by a compatible replacement, the obsoleted package should also be provided in order to not cause unnecessary dependency breakage. If the obsoleting package is not a compatible replacement for the old one, leave out the Provides. Mesa.armv7hl: E: no-binary Mesa-KHR-devel.armv7hl: E: no-binary Mesa-devel.armv7hl: E: no-binary Mesa-dri-devel.armv7hl: E: no-binary Mesa-libEGL-devel.armv7hl: E: no-binary Mesa-libGL-devel.armv7hl: E: no-binary Mesa-libGLESv1_CM-devel.armv7hl: E: no-binary Mesa-libGLESv2-devel.armv7hl: E: no-binary Mesa-libGLESv3-devel.armv7hl: E: no-binary libgbm-devel.armv7hl: E: no-binary The package should be of the noarch architecture because it doesn't contain any binaries. Mesa.spec: W: no-%check-section The spec file does not contain an %check section. Please check if the package has a testsuite and what it takes to enable the testsuite as part of the package build. If it is not possible to run it in the build environment (OBS/koji) or no testsuite exists, then please ignore this warning. You should not insert an empty %check section. Mesa-libEGL1.armv7hl: E: devel-file-in-non-devel-package (Badness: 50) /usr/lib/libEGL_mesa.so Mesa-libGL1.armv7hl: E: devel-file-in-non-devel-package (Badness: 50) /usr/lib/libGLX_mesa.so A file that is needed only e.g. when developing or building software is included in a non-devel package. These files should go in devel packages. Check time report (>1% & >0.1s): Check Duration (in s) Fraction (in %) Checked files ExtractRpm 2.3 66.6 SignatureCheck 0.4 12.1 SpecCheck 0.2 6.1 BashismsCheck 0.1 3.4 FilesCheck 0.1 3.2 TagsCheck 0.1 3.0 TOTAL 3.4 100.0 14 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 19 errors, 7 warnings, 32 filtered, 117 badness; has taken 3.5 s