============================ rpmlint session starts ============================ rpmlint: 2.8.0 configuration: /opt/testing/lib/python3.13/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/cron-whitelist.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/dbus-services.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/device-files-whitelist.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/licenses.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/opensuse.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/pam-modules.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/permissions-whitelist.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/pie-executables.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/polkit-rules-whitelist.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/scoring.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/security.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/sudoers-whitelist.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/sysctl-whitelist.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/systemd-tmpfiles.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/users-groups.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/world-writable-whitelist.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/zypper-plugins.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring-strict.override.toml rpmlintrc: /home/abuild/rpmbuild/SOURCES/xemacs-rpmlintrc checks: 42, packages: 4 xemacs.spec:40: W: suse-update-desktop-file-deprecated %suse_update_desktop_file is deprecated The usage of %suse_update_desktop_file is deprecated and changes should be migrated to the upstream. Please check the build log for details. xemacs.armv7hl: W: potential-bashisms /usr/lib/xemacs/21.5.34/arm-suse-linux/vcdiff xemacs.armv7hl: W: potential-bashisms /usr/lib/xemacs/21.5.34/arm-suse-linux/rcs2log checkbashisms reported potential bashisms in a /bin/sh shell script, you might want to manually check this script for bashisms. xemacs.armv7hl: W: position-independent-executable-suggested /usr/bin/ellcc xemacs.armv7hl: W: position-independent-executable-suggested /usr/bin/gnuclient xemacs.armv7hl: W: position-independent-executable-suggested /usr/bin/ootags xemacs.armv7hl: W: position-independent-executable-suggested /usr/bin/xemacs xemacs.armv7hl: W: position-independent-executable-suggested /usr/lib/xemacs/21.5.34/arm-suse-linux/cvtmail xemacs.armv7hl: W: position-independent-executable-suggested /usr/lib/xemacs/21.5.34/arm-suse-linux/digest-doc xemacs.armv7hl: W: position-independent-executable-suggested /usr/lib/xemacs/21.5.34/arm-suse-linux/fakemail xemacs.armv7hl: W: position-independent-executable-suggested /usr/lib/xemacs/21.5.34/arm-suse-linux/gnuserv xemacs.armv7hl: W: position-independent-executable-suggested /usr/lib/xemacs/21.5.34/arm-suse-linux/hexl xemacs.armv7hl: W: position-independent-executable-suggested /usr/lib/xemacs/21.5.34/arm-suse-linux/make-docfile xemacs.armv7hl: W: position-independent-executable-suggested /usr/lib/xemacs/21.5.34/arm-suse-linux/mmencode xemacs.armv7hl: W: position-independent-executable-suggested /usr/lib/xemacs/21.5.34/arm-suse-linux/movemail xemacs.armv7hl: W: position-independent-executable-suggested /usr/lib/xemacs/21.5.34/arm-suse-linux/profile xemacs.armv7hl: W: position-independent-executable-suggested /usr/lib/xemacs/21.5.34/arm-suse-linux/sorted-doc This executable should be position independent (all binaries should). Check that it is built with -fPIE/-fpie in compiler flags and -pie in linker flags. xemacs.spec: W: patch-fuzz-is-changed The internal patch fuzz value was changed, and could hide patchs issues, or could lead to applying a patch at the wrong location. Usually, this is often the sign that someone didn't check if a patch is still needed and do not want to rediff it. It is usually better to rediff the patch and try to send it upstream. xemacs-info.noarch: W: package-with-huge-docs 100% More than half the size of your package is documentation. Consider splitting it into a -doc subpackage. xemacs.spec:49: E: obsolete-suse-version-check 1130 xemacs.spec:148: E: obsolete-suse-version-check 1120 xemacs.spec:163: E: obsolete-suse-version-check 1120 The specfile contains a comparison of %suse_version against a suse release that is no longer in maintenance. Consider removing obsolete parts of your spec file to make it more readable. xemacs.spec: W: no-%check-section The spec file does not contain an %check section. Please check if the package has a testsuite and what it takes to enable the testsuite as part of the package build. If it is not possible to run it in the build environment (OBS/koji) or no testsuite exists, then please ignore this warning. You should not insert an empty %check section. xemacs.armv7hl: W: name-repeated-in-summary XEmacs xemacs.src: W: name-repeated-in-summary XEmacs The name of the package is repeated in its summary. Make the summary brief and to the point without including redundant information in it. xemacs.spec:480: W: macro-in-comment %{version} xemacs.spec:481: W: macro-in-comment %{version} xemacs.spec:483: W: macro-in-comment %{version} xemacs.spec:484: W: macro-in-comment %{version} xemacs.spec:523: W: macro-in-comment %{buildroot} There is a unescaped macro after a shell style comment in the specfile. Macros are expanded everywhere, so check if it can cause a problem in this case and escape the macro with another leading % if appropriate. xemacs.armv7hl: W: hidden-file-or-dir /etc/skel/.xemacs The file or directory is hidden. You should see if this is normal, and delete it from the package if not. xemacs.armv7hl: W: binary-or-shlib-calls-gethostbyname /usr/bin/gnuclient xemacs.armv7hl: W: binary-or-shlib-calls-gethostbyname /usr/bin/xemacs xemacs.armv7hl: W: binary-or-shlib-calls-gethostbyname /usr/lib/xemacs/21.5.34/arm-suse-linux/gnuserv xemacs.armv7hl: W: binary-or-shlib-calls-gethostbyname /usr/lib/xemacs/21.5.34/arm-suse-linux/movemail The binary calls gethostbyname. Please port the code to use getaddrinfo. Check time report (>1% & >0.1s): Check Duration (in s) Fraction (in %) Checked files ExtractRpm 2.4 51.0 BashismsCheck 1.3 27.0 BinariesCheck 0.5 9.6 FilesCheck 0.2 3.8 SignatureCheck 0.2 3.3 BuildRootAndDateCheck 0.1 2.2 TOTAL 4.7 100.0 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 32 warnings, 41 filtered, 3 badness; has taken 4.8 s