============================ rpmlint session starts ============================
rpmlint: 2.8.0
configuration:
    /opt/testing/lib/python3.13/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/cron-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/dbus-services.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/device-files-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/licenses.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/opensuse.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/pam-modules.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/permissions-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/pie-executables.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/polkit-rules-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/scoring.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/security.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/sudoers-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/sysctl-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/systemd-tmpfiles.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/users-groups.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/world-writable-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/zypper-plugins.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring-strict.override.toml
rpmlintrc:
    /home/abuild/rpmbuild/SOURCES/ffmpeg-8-rpmlintrc
checks: 42, packages: 16

ffmpeg-8.armv6hl: W: package-with-huge-docs 68%
More than half the size of your package is documentation. Consider splitting
it into a -doc subpackage.

ffmpeg-8-libavcodec-devel.armv6hl: E: no-binary
ffmpeg-8-libavdevice-devel.armv6hl: E: no-binary
ffmpeg-8-libavfilter-devel.armv6hl: E: no-binary
ffmpeg-8-libavformat-devel.armv6hl: E: no-binary
ffmpeg-8-libavutil-devel.armv6hl: E: no-binary
ffmpeg-8-libswresample-devel.armv6hl: E: no-binary
ffmpeg-8-libswscale-devel.armv6hl: E: no-binary
The package should be of the noarch architecture because it doesn't contain
any binaries.

ffmpeg-8.spec: W: no-%check-section
The spec file does not contain an %check section. Please check if the package
has a testsuite and what it takes to enable the testsuite as part of the
package build. If it is not possible to run it in the build environment
(OBS/koji) or no testsuite exists, then please ignore this warning. You should
not insert an empty %check section.

ffmpeg-8.spec:772: W: macro-in-comment %flavor
There is a unescaped macro after a shell style comment in the specfile. Macros
are expanded everywhere, so check if it can cause a problem in this case and
escape the macro with another leading % if appropriate.

Check time report (>1% & >0.1s):
    Check                            Duration (in s)   Fraction (in %)  Checked files
    ExtractRpm                                   3.1              65.6               
    BinariesCheck                                0.7              15.8               
    SignatureCheck                               0.3               6.5               
    SharedLibraryPolicyCheck                     0.2               3.9               
    FilesCheck                                   0.1               2.6               
    TOTAL                                        4.7             100.0               

 16 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 7 errors, 3 warnings, 111 filtered, 7 badness; has taken 4.8 s