============================ rpmlint session starts ============================
rpmlint: 2.8.0
configuration:
    /opt/testing/lib/python3.13/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/cron-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/dbus-services.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/device-files-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/licenses.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/opensuse.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/pam-modules.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/permissions-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/pie-executables.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/polkit-rules-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/scoring.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/security.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/sudoers-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/sysctl-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/systemd-tmpfiles.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/users-groups.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/world-writable-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/zypper-plugins.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring-strict.override.toml
checks: 41, packages: 6

typelib-1_0-GXml-0_20.armv6hl: W: obsolete-not-provided typelib-1_0-GXml--0_20-2_0_2
If a package is obsoleted by a compatible replacement, the obsoleted package
should also be provided in order to not cause unnecessary dependency breakage.
If the obsoleting package is not a compatible replacement for the old one,
leave out the Provides.

gxml-devel.armv6hl: E: no-binary
typelib-1_0-GXml-0_20.armv6hl: E: no-binary
The package should be of the noarch architecture because it doesn't contain
any binaries.

gxml.spec: W: no-%check-section
The spec file does not contain an %check section. Please check if the package
has a testsuite and what it takes to enable the testsuite as part of the
package build. If it is not possible to run it in the build environment
(OBS/koji) or no testsuite exists, then please ignore this warning. You should
not insert an empty %check section.

gxml.src: W: name-repeated-in-summary GXml
The name of the package is repeated in its summary. Make the summary brief and
to the point without including redundant information in it.

Check time report (>1% & >0.1s):
    Check                            Duration (in s)   Fraction (in %)  Checked files
    ExtractRpm                                   1.1              56.5               
    FilesCheck                                   0.3              15.0               
    BuildRootAndDateCheck                        0.1               6.4               
    SignatureCheck                               0.1               5.5               
    TOTAL                                        1.9             100.0               

 6 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 3 warnings, 21 filtered, 2 badness; has taken 2.0 s