============================ rpmlint session starts ============================
rpmlint: 2.8.0
configuration:
    /opt/testing/lib/python3.13/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/cron-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/dbus-services.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/device-files-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/licenses.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/opensuse.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/pam-modules.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/permissions-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/pie-executables.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/polkit-rules-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/scoring.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/security.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/sudoers-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/sysctl-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/systemd-tmpfiles.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/users-groups.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/world-writable-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/zypper-plugins.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring-strict.override.toml
checks: 41, packages: 2

scala-bootstrap.noarch: W: obsolete-not-provided scala-swing
If a package is obsoleted by a compatible replacement, the obsoleted package
should also be provided in order to not cause unnecessary dependency breakage.
If the obsoleting package is not a compatible replacement for the old one,
leave out the Provides.

scala.spec: W: no-%check-section
The spec file does not contain an %check section. Please check if the package
has a testsuite and what it takes to enable the testsuite as part of the
package build. If it is not possible to run it in the build environment
(OBS/koji) or no testsuite exists, then please ignore this warning. You should
not insert an empty %check section.

scala.spec:403: W: macro-in-comment %{buildroot}
scala.spec:403: W: macro-in-comment %{_datadir}
scala.spec:404: W: macro-in-comment %{SOURCE15}
scala.spec:404: W: macro-in-comment %{SOURCE16}
scala.spec:404: W: macro-in-comment %{buildroot}
scala.spec:404: W: macro-in-comment %{_datadir}
There is a unescaped macro after a shell style comment in the specfile. Macros
are expanded everywhere, so check if it can cause a problem in this case and
escape the macro with another leading % if appropriate.

scala-bootstrap.src: E: invalid-spec-name
The spec file name (without the .spec suffix) must match the package name
('Name:' tag).

scala-bootstrap.noarch: E: env-script-interpreter (Badness: 9) /usr/bin/fsc /usr/bin/env bash
scala-bootstrap.noarch: E: env-script-interpreter (Badness: 9) /usr/bin/scala /usr/bin/env bash
scala-bootstrap.noarch: E: env-script-interpreter (Badness: 9) /usr/bin/scalac /usr/bin/env bash
scala-bootstrap.noarch: E: env-script-interpreter (Badness: 9) /usr/bin/scaladoc /usr/bin/env bash
scala-bootstrap.noarch: E: env-script-interpreter (Badness: 9) /usr/bin/scalap /usr/bin/env bash
This script uses 'env' as an interpreter. For the rpm runtime dependency
detection to work, the shebang #!/usr/bin/env <interpreter>  needs to be
patched into #!/usr/bin/<interpreter>  otherwise the package dependency
generator merely adds a dependency on /usr/bin/env rather than the actual
interpreter /usr/bin/<interpreter>.  Alternatively, if the file should not be
executed, then ensure that it is not marked as executable or don't install it
in a path that is reserved for executables.

Check time report (>1% & >0.1s):
    Check                            Duration (in s)   Fraction (in %)  Checked files
    ExtractRpm                                   3.6              80.7               
    ZipCheck                                     0.5              10.3               
    SignatureCheck                               0.3               7.0               
    TOTAL                                        4.5             100.0               

 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 6 errors, 8 warnings, 8 filtered, 46 badness; has taken 4.5 s