============================ rpmlint session starts ============================
rpmlint: 2.8.0
configuration:
    /opt/testing/lib64/python3.13/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/cron-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/dbus-services.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/device-files-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/licenses.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/opensuse.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/pam-modules.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/permissions-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/pie-executables.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/polkit-rules-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/scoring.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/security.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/sudoers-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/sysctl-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/systemd-tmpfiles.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/users-groups.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/world-writable-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/zypper-plugins.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring-strict.override.toml
checks: 42, packages: 9

fwupd.x86_64: W: self-obsoletion dbxtool <= 8 obsoletes dbxtool
The package obsoletes itself. This is known to cause errors in various tools
and should thus be avoided, usually by using appropriately versioned Obsoletes
and/or Provides and avoiding unversioned ones.

fwupd.x86_64: W: obsolete-not-provided fwupdate
If a package is obsoleted by a compatible replacement, the obsoleted package
should also be provided in order to not cause unnecessary dependency breakage.
If the obsoleting package is not a compatible replacement for the old one,
leave out the Provides.

fwupd.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/grub.d/35_fwupd
fwupd.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/pki/fwupd-metadata/GPG-KEY-Linux-Foundation-Metadata
fwupd.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/pki/fwupd-metadata/GPG-KEY-Linux-Vendor-Firmware-Service
fwupd.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/pki/fwupd-metadata/LVFS-CA-2025PQ.pem
fwupd.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/pki/fwupd-metadata/LVFS-CA.pem
fwupd.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/pki/fwupd/GPG-KEY-Linux-Foundation-Firmware
fwupd.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/pki/fwupd/GPG-KEY-Linux-Vendor-Firmware-Service
fwupd.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/pki/fwupd/LVFS-CA-2025PQ.pem
fwupd.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/pki/fwupd/LVFS-CA.pem
A non-executable file in your package is being installed in /etc, but is not a
configuration file. All non-executable files in /etc should be configuration
files. Mark the file as %config in the spec file.

fwupd.x86_64: W: files-duplicate /etc/pki/fwupd/GPG-KEY-Linux-Vendor-Firmware-Service /etc/pki/fwupd-metadata/GPG-KEY-Linux-Vendor-Firmware-Service
fwupd.x86_64: W: files-duplicate /etc/pki/fwupd/LVFS-CA-2025PQ.pem /etc/pki/fwupd-metadata/LVFS-CA-2025PQ.pem
fwupd.x86_64: W: files-duplicate /etc/pki/fwupd/LVFS-CA.pem /etc/pki/fwupd-metadata/LVFS-CA.pem
Your package contains duplicated files that are not hard- or symlinks. You
should use the %fdupes macro to link the files to one.

Check time report (>1% & >0.1s):
    Check                            Duration (in s)   Fraction (in %)  Checked files
    ExtractRpm                                   1.9              47.1               
    FilesCheck                                   0.9              22.9               
    BinariesCheck                                0.4               8.8               
    BuildRootAndDateCheck                        0.2               5.6               
    BashismsCheck                                0.1               3.3               
    SpecCheck                                    0.1               3.0               
    SignatureCheck                               0.1               2.6               
    TOTAL                                        4.1             100.0               

 9 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 14 warnings, 32 filtered, 0 badness; has taken 4.1 s