============================ rpmlint session starts ============================ rpmlint: 2.8.0 configuration: /opt/testing/lib64/python3.13/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/cron-whitelist.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/dbus-services.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/device-files-whitelist.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/licenses.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/opensuse.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/pam-modules.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/permissions-whitelist.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/pie-executables.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/polkit-rules-whitelist.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/scoring.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/security.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/sudoers-whitelist.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/sysctl-whitelist.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/systemd-tmpfiles.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/users-groups.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/world-writable-whitelist.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/zypper-plugins.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring-strict.override.toml checks: 42, packages: 2 google-osconfig-agent.x86_64: E: statically-linked-binary /usr/bin/google_osconfig_agent The package installs a statically linked binary or object file. google-osconfig-agent.spec:94: W: shared-dir-glob-in-files %attr(0755,root,root) %{_bindir}/* The %files section contains "%{_bindir}/*", "%{_datadir}/*", "%{_docdir}/*", "%{_includedir}/*" or "%{_mandir}/*". These can lead to packagers not noticing when upstream adds new and possibly conflicting files in these directories. Therefore, files in these directories should be explicitely listed like "%{_bindir}/foobar" or "%{_includedir}/foobar.h". google-osconfig-agent.spec: W: no-%check-section The spec file does not contain an %check section. Please check if the package has a testsuite and what it takes to enable the testsuite as part of the package build. If it is not possible to run it in the build environment (OBS/koji) or no testsuite exists, then please ignore this warning. You should not insert an empty %check section. google-osconfig-agent.x86_64: E: files-duplicated-waste (Badness: 100) 110009 Your package contains duplicated files that are not hard- or symlinks. You should use the %fdupes macro to link the files to one. google-osconfig-agent.x86_64: W: files-duplicate /usr/share/licenses/google-osconfig-agent/THIRD_PARTY_LICENSES/github.com/GoogleCloudPlatform/osconfig/LICENSE /usr/share/licenses/google-osconfig-agent/LICENSE:/usr/share/licenses/google-osconfig-agent/THIRD_PARTY_LICENSES/github.com/GoogleCloudPlatform/guest-logging-go/logger/LICENSE google-osconfig-agent.x86_64: W: files-duplicate /usr/share/licenses/google-osconfig-agent/THIRD_PARTY_LICENSES/google.golang.org/grpc/LICENSE /usr/share/licenses/google-osconfig-agent/THIRD_PARTY_LICENSES/cloud.google.com/go/LICENSE:/usr/share/licenses/google-osconfig-agent/THIRD_PARTY_LICENSES/cloud.google.com/go/logging/LICENSE:/usr/share/licenses/google-osconfig-agent/THIRD_PARTY_LICENSES/cloud.google.com/go/osconfig/agentendpoint/apiv1/LICENSE:/usr/share/licenses/google-osconfig-agent/THIRD_PARTY_LICENSES/cloud.google.com/go/storage/LICENSE:/usr/share/licenses/google-osconfig-agent/THIRD_PARTY_LICENSES/github.com/golang/mock/gomock/LICENSE:(and 1 more) google-osconfig-agent.x86_64: W: files-duplicate /usr/share/licenses/google-osconfig-agent/THIRD_PARTY_LICENSES/github.com/golang/groupcache/lru/LICENSE /usr/share/licenses/google-osconfig-agent/THIRD_PARTY_LICENSES/github.com/golang/glog/LICENSE google-osconfig-agent.x86_64: W: files-duplicate /usr/share/licenses/google-osconfig-agent/THIRD_PARTY_LICENSES/golang.org/x/text/LICENSE /usr/share/licenses/google-osconfig-agent/THIRD_PARTY_LICENSES/github.com/tarm/serial/LICENSE:/usr/share/licenses/google-osconfig-agent/THIRD_PARTY_LICENSES/golang.org/x/crypto/LICENSE:/usr/share/licenses/google-osconfig-agent/THIRD_PARTY_LICENSES/golang.org/x/net/LICENSE:/usr/share/licenses/google-osconfig-agent/THIRD_PARTY_LICENSES/golang.org/x/oauth2/LICENSE:/usr/share/licenses/google-osconfig-agent/THIRD_PARTY_LICENSES/golang.org/x/sync/semaphore/LICENSE:(and 1 more) Your package contains duplicated files that are not hard- or symlinks. You should use the %fdupes macro to link the files to one. Check time report (>1% & >0.1s): Check Duration (in s) Fraction (in %) Checked files ExtractRpm 2.5 92.2 TOTAL 2.7 100.0 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 6 warnings, 7 filtered, 101 badness; has taken 2.7 s