============================ rpmlint session starts ============================
rpmlint: 2.7.0
configuration:
    /opt/testing/lib64/python3.13/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/cron-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/dbus-services.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/device-files-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/licenses.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/opensuse.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/pam-modules.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/permissions-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/pie-executables.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/polkit-rules-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/scoring.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/security.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/sudoers-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/sysctl-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/systemd-tmpfiles.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/users-groups.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/world-writable-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/zypper-plugins.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring-strict.override.toml
checks: 41, packages: 4

xdm.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/lib/X11/displaymanagers/console
xdm.x86_64: E: update-alternatives-requirement-missing
The package does not have update-alternatives in Requires(post) or
Requires(postun). This is needed for the proper scriptlet execution.

xdm.x86_64: W: potential-bashisms /usr/etc/X11/xdm/RunChooser
xdm.x86_64: W: potential-bashisms /usr/etc/X11/xdm/Xstartup
xdm.x86_64: W: potential-bashisms /usr/etc/X11/xdm/TakeDevices
xdm.x86_64: W: potential-bashisms /usr/etc/X11/xdm/GiveDevices
xdm.x86_64: W: potential-bashisms /usr/etc/X11/xdm/Xreset
xdm.x86_64: W: potential-bashisms /usr/etc/X11/xdm/Xsetup
checkbashisms reported potential bashisms in a /bin/sh shell script, you might
want to manually check this script for bashisms.

xdm.x86_64: I: package-supports-update-alternatives
displaymanager-sysconfig.x86_64: E: no-binary
xdm-xsession.x86_64: E: no-binary
The package should be of the noarch architecture because it doesn't contain
any binaries.

xdm.spec: W: no-%check-section
The spec file does not contain an %check section. Please check if the package
has a testsuite and what it takes to enable the testsuite as part of the
package build. If it is not possible to run it in the build environment
(OBS/koji) or no testsuite exists, then please ignore this warning. You should
not insert an empty %check section.

xdm.spec:86: W: macro-in-comment %post
There is a unescaped macro after a shell style comment in the specfile. Macros
are expanded everywhere, so check if it can cause a problem in this case and
escape the macro with another leading % if appropriate.

xdm.x86_64: W: binary-or-shlib-calls-gethostbyname /usr/bin/chooser
xdm.x86_64: W: binary-or-shlib-calls-gethostbyname /usr/bin/xdm
The binary calls gethostbyname. Please port the code to use getaddrinfo.

Check time report (>1% & >0.1s):
    Check                            Duration (in s)   Fraction (in %)  Checked files
    TOTAL                                        0.3             100.0               

 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 4 errors, 10 warnings, 39 filtered, 4 badness; has taken 0.3 s