============================ rpmlint session starts ============================ rpmlint: 2.8.0 configuration: /opt/testing/lib/python3.13/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/cron-whitelist.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/dbus-services.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/device-files-whitelist.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/licenses.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/opensuse.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/pam-modules.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/permissions-whitelist.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/pie-executables.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/polkit-rules-whitelist.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/scoring.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/security.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/sudoers-whitelist.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/sysctl-whitelist.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/systemd-tmpfiles.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/users-groups.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/world-writable-whitelist.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/zypper-plugins.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring-strict.override.toml rpmlintrc: /home/abuild/rpmbuild/SOURCES/ffmpeg-7-rpmlintrc checks: 41, packages: 18 libavcodec61.i586: E: shlib-with-non-pic-code /usr/lib/libavcodec.so.61.19.101 libavfilter10.i586: E: shlib-with-non-pic-code /usr/lib/libavfilter.so.10.4.100 libavutil59.i586: E: shlib-with-non-pic-code /usr/lib/libavutil.so.59.39.100 libpostproc58.i586: E: shlib-with-non-pic-code /usr/lib/libpostproc.so.58.3.100 libswresample5.i586: E: shlib-with-non-pic-code /usr/lib/libswresample.so.5.3.100 libswscale8.i586: E: shlib-with-non-pic-code /usr/lib/libswscale.so.8.3.100 The listed shared libraries contain object code that was compiled without -fPIC. All object code in shared libraries should be recompiled separately from the static libraries with the -fPIC option. Use the ``eu-findtextrel'' command on a library with debugging symbols to list code compiled without -fPIC. Another common mistake that causes this problem is linking with ``gcc -Wl,-shared'' instead of ``gcc -shared''. ffmpeg-7.i586: W: package-with-huge-docs 64% More than half the size of your package is documentation. Consider splitting it into a -doc subpackage. ffmpeg-7-libavcodec-devel.i586: E: no-binary ffmpeg-7-libavdevice-devel.i586: E: no-binary ffmpeg-7-libavfilter-devel.i586: E: no-binary ffmpeg-7-libavformat-devel.i586: E: no-binary ffmpeg-7-libavutil-devel.i586: E: no-binary ffmpeg-7-libpostproc-devel.i586: E: no-binary ffmpeg-7-libswresample-devel.i586: E: no-binary ffmpeg-7-libswscale-devel.i586: E: no-binary The package should be of the noarch architecture because it doesn't contain any binaries. ffmpeg-7.spec: W: no-%check-section The spec file does not contain an %check section. Please check if the package has a testsuite and what it takes to enable the testsuite as part of the package build. If it is not possible to run it in the build environment (OBS/koji) or no testsuite exists, then please ignore this warning. You should not insert an empty %check section. ffmpeg-7.spec:825: W: macro-in-comment %flavor There is a unescaped macro after a shell style comment in the specfile. Macros are expanded everywhere, so check if it can cause a problem in this case and escape the macro with another leading % if appropriate. Check time report (>1% & >0.1s): Check Duration (in s) Fraction (in %) Checked files ExtractRpm 2.4 50.6 BinariesCheck 0.9 18.4 SharedLibraryPolicyCheck 0.3 7.2 SignatureCheck 0.3 7.0 FilesCheck 0.2 3.8 SpecCheck 0.2 3.6 TagsCheck 0.2 3.5 TOTAL 4.8 100.0 18 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 14 errors, 3 warnings, 126 filtered, 14 badness; has taken 4.8 s