============================ rpmlint session starts ============================ rpmlint: 2.5.0 configuration: /opt/testing/lib/python3.11/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/cron-whitelist.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/dbus-services.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/device-files-whitelist.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/licenses.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/opensuse.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/pam-modules.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/permissions-whitelist.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/pie-executables.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/polkit-rules-whitelist.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/scoring.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/security.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/sudoers-whitelist.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/sysctl-whitelist.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/systemd-tmpfiles.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/users-groups.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/world-writable-whitelist.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/zypper-plugins.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring-strict.override.toml checks: 41, packages: 15 evince-lang.noarch: W: package-with-huge-docs 66% More than half the size of your package is documentation. Consider splitting it into a -doc subpackage. evince.armv6hl: W: obsolete-not-provided nautilus-evince If a package is obsoleted by a compatible replacement, the obsoleted package should also be provided in order to not cause unnecessary dependency breakage. If the obsoleting package is not a compatible replacement for the old one, leave out the Provides. evince-devel.armv6hl: E: no-binary typelib-1_0-EvinceDocument-3_0.armv6hl: E: no-binary typelib-1_0-EvinceView-3_0.armv6hl: E: no-binary The package should be of the noarch architecture because it doesn't contain any binaries. evince.spec: W: no-%check-section The spec file does not contain an %check section. Please check if the package has a testsuite and what it takes to enable the testsuite as part of the package build. If it is not possible to run it in the build environment (OBS/koji) or no testsuite exists, then please ignore this warning. You should not insert an empty %check section. Check time report (>1% & >0.1s): Check Duration (in s) Fraction (in %) Checked files ExtractRpm 1.9 40.1 FilesCheck 1.2 25.4 BinariesCheck 0.3 6.8 BuildRootAndDateCheck 0.3 5.3 SignatureCheck 0.2 5.0 FilelistCheck 0.2 4.6 SpecCheck 0.1 3.1 BashismsCheck 0.1 2.7 TOTAL 4.8 100.0 15 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 3 warnings, 1002 filtered, 3 badness; has taken 5.0 s