============================ rpmlint session starts ============================ rpmlint: 2.8.0 configuration: /opt/testing/lib/python3.13/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/cron-whitelist.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/dbus-services.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/device-files-whitelist.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/licenses.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/opensuse.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/pam-modules.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/permissions-whitelist.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/pie-executables.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/polkit-rules-whitelist.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/scoring.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/security.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/sudoers-whitelist.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/sysctl-whitelist.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/systemd-tmpfiles.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/users-groups.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/world-writable-whitelist.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/zypper-plugins.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring-strict.override.toml checks: 41, packages: 4 libtomcrypt1.armv6hl: E: shared-library-not-executable /usr/lib/libtomcrypt.so.1.0.1 This library doesn't have the executable bit set. Without this bit set, rpm for instance won't be able identify the file as a library and not generate dependencies or strip debug symbols from it. libtomcrypt-examples.armv6hl: W: package-with-huge-docs 100% More than half the size of your package is documentation. Consider splitting it into a -doc subpackage. libtomcrypt-devel.armv6hl: E: no-binary libtomcrypt-examples.armv6hl: E: no-binary The package should be of the noarch architecture because it doesn't contain any binaries. libtomcrypt-examples.armv6hl: E: devel-dependency libtomcrypt-devel Your package has a dependency on a devel package but it's not a devel package itself. Check time report (>1% & >0.1s): Check Duration (in s) Fraction (in %) Checked files ExtractRpm 0.4 67.0 TOTAL 0.6 100.0 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 4 errors, 1 warnings, 7 filtered, 4 badness; has taken 0.6 s