============================ rpmlint session starts ============================ rpmlint: 2.8.0 configuration: /opt/testing/lib64/python3.13/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/cron-whitelist.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/dbus-services.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/device-files-whitelist.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/licenses.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/opensuse.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/pam-modules.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/permissions-whitelist.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/pie-executables.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/polkit-rules-whitelist.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/scoring.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/security.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/sudoers-whitelist.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/sysctl-whitelist.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/systemd-tmpfiles.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/users-groups.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/world-writable-whitelist.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/zypper-plugins.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring-strict.override.toml checks: 42, packages: 10 marble.aarch64: W: self-obsoletion marble5 < 25.12.2 obsoletes marble5 < 25.12.2 marble-data.noarch: W: self-obsoletion marble5-data < 25.12.2 obsoletes marble5-data < 25.12.2 The package obsoletes itself. This is known to cause errors in various tools and should thus be avoided, usually by using appropriately versioned Obsoletes and/or Provides and avoiding unversioned ones. marble-kde.aarch64: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/applications/org.kde.marble.desktop marble-qt.aarch64: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/applications/org.kde.marble-qt.desktop This text file has executable bits set or is located in a path dedicated for executables, but lacks a shebang and cannot thus be executed. If the file is meant to be an executable script, add the shebang, otherwise remove the executable bits or move the file elsewhere. marble-lang.noarch: W: package-with-huge-docs 62% More than half the size of your package is documentation. Consider splitting it into a -doc subpackage. marble.spec: W: no-%check-section The spec file does not contain an %check section. Please check if the package has a testsuite and what it takes to enable the testsuite as part of the package build. If it is not possible to run it in the build environment (OBS/koji) or no testsuite exists, then please ignore this warning. You should not insert an empty %check section. marble.aarch64: W: files-duplicate /usr/share/licenses/marble/LICENSES/GPL-3.0-or-later.txt /usr/share/licenses/marble/LICENSES/GPL-3.0-only.txt marble.aarch64: W: files-duplicate /usr/share/licenses/marble/LICENSES/LGPL-2.1-or-later.txt /usr/share/licenses/marble/LICENSES/LGPL-2.1-only.txt Your package contains duplicated files that are not hard- or symlinks. You should use the %fdupes macro to link the files to one. libastro1.aarch64: E: explicit-lib-dependency libmarblewidget-qt6-28 You must let rpm find the library dependencies by itself. Do not put unneeded explicit Requires: tags. marble.aarch64: W: desktopfile-without-binary /usr/share/applications/marble_geojson.desktop marble marble.aarch64: W: desktopfile-without-binary /usr/share/applications/marble_gpx.desktop marble marble.aarch64: W: desktopfile-without-binary /usr/share/applications/marble_kml.desktop marble marble.aarch64: W: desktopfile-without-binary /usr/share/applications/marble_kmz.desktop marble marble.aarch64: W: desktopfile-without-binary /usr/share/applications/marble_shp.desktop marble The .desktop file is for a file not present in the package. You should check the requires or see if this is not a error. Check time report (>1% & >0.1s): Check Duration (in s) Fraction (in %) Checked files ExtractRpm 4.9 57.6 BinariesCheck 2.2 25.6 SignatureCheck 0.4 5.1 FilesCheck 0.2 3.0 SharedLibraryPolicyCheck 0.2 2.8 BuildRootAndDateCheck 0.2 1.8 TOTAL 8.5 100.0 10 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 11 warnings, 43 filtered, 3 badness; has taken 8.6 s