============================ rpmlint session starts ============================
rpmlint: 2.9.0
configuration:
    /opt/testing/lib/python3.13/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/cron-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/dbus-services.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/device-files-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/licenses.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/opensuse.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/pam-modules.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/permissions-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/pie-executables.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/polkit-rules-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/scoring.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/security.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/sudoers-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/sysctl-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/systemd-tmpfiles.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/users-groups.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/world-writable-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/zypper-plugins.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring-strict.override.toml
checks: 42, packages: 6

binutils.spec:761: W: shared-dir-glob-in-files %{_bindir}/*
The %files section contains "%{_bindir}/*", "%{_datadir}/*", "%{_docdir}/*",
"%{_includedir}/*" or "%{_mandir}/*".  These can lead to packagers not
noticing when upstream adds new and possibly conflicting files in these
directories. Therefore, files in these directories should be explicitely
listed like "%{_bindir}/foobar" or "%{_includedir}/foobar.h".

binutils-devel.armv7hl: E: readelf-failed /usr/lib/libbfd.a Error: Not an ELF file - it has the wrong magic bytes at the start
Executing readelf on this file failed, all checks could not be run.

binutils.armv7hl: I: package-supports-libalternatives
binutils.spec:214: E: obsolete-suse-version-check 1310
The specfile contains a comparison of %suse_version against a suse release
that is no longer in maintenance. Consider removing obsolete parts of your
spec file to make it more readable.

binutils.armv7hl: W: name-repeated-in-summary Binutils
binutils.src: W: name-repeated-in-summary Binutils
The name of the package is repeated in its summary. Make the summary brief and
to the point without including redundant information in it.

binutils.spec:215: W: macro-in-comment %ix86
binutils.spec:215: W: macro-in-comment %arm
binutils.spec:215: W: macro-in-comment %x86_64
binutils.spec:215: W: macro-in-comment %sparc
binutils.spec:463: W: macro-in-comment %{suse_version}
binutils.spec:465: W: macro-in-comment %endif
There is a unescaped macro after a shell style comment in the specfile. Macros
are expanded everywhere, so check if it can cause a problem in this case and
escape the macro with another leading % if appropriate.

binutils.armv7hl: E: filelist-forbidden-fhs23 /usr/armv7hl-suse-linux-gnueabi
File violates FHS 2.3.

binutils.armv7hl: E: explicit-lib-dependency libsframe2
You must let rpm find the library dependencies by itself. Do not put unneeded
explicit Requires: tags.

Check time report (>1% & >0.1s):
    Check                            Duration (in s)   Fraction (in %)  Checked files
    ExtractRpm                                   5.5              70.6               
    BinariesCheck                                0.6               7.8               
    FilesCheck                                   0.5               5.8               
    BashismsCheck                                0.4               5.6               
    SignatureCheck                               0.3               3.3               
    BuildRootAndDateCheck                        0.2               2.7               
    SpecCheck                                    0.1               1.4               
    TOTAL                                        7.7             100.0               

 6 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 4 errors, 9 warnings, 555 filtered, 4 badness; has taken 7.8 s