============================ rpmlint session starts ============================ rpmlint: 2.9.0 configuration: /opt/testing/lib/python3.13/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/cron-whitelist.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/dbus-services.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/device-files-whitelist.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/licenses.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/opensuse.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/pam-modules.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/permissions-whitelist.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/pie-executables.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/polkit-rules-whitelist.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/scoring.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/security.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/sudoers-whitelist.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/sysctl-whitelist.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/systemd-tmpfiles.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/users-groups.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/world-writable-whitelist.toml /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/zypper-plugins.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring-strict.override.toml checks: 42, packages: 4 gecode-devel.armv7hl: E: no-binary The package should be of the noarch architecture because it doesn't contain any binaries. gecode.spec:28: W: macro-in-comment %{version} gecode.spec:28: W: macro-in-comment %{name} gecode.spec:28: W: macro-in-comment %{version} There is a unescaped macro after a shell style comment in the specfile. Macros are expanded everywhere, so check if it can cause a problem in this case and escape the macro with another leading % if appropriate. Check time report (>1% & >0.1s): Check Duration (in s) Fraction (in %) Checked files ExtractRpm 2.2 60.4 BinariesCheck 0.5 12.6 SharedLibraryPolicyCheck 0.3 8.8 BashismsCheck 0.3 7.0 FilesCheck 0.2 4.6 TOTAL 3.6 100.0 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 3 warnings, 79 filtered, 1 badness; has taken 3.7 s