============================ rpmlint session starts ============================
rpmlint: 2.9.0
configuration:
    /opt/testing/lib64/python3.13/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/cron-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/dbus-services.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/device-files-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/licenses.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/opensuse.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/pam-modules.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/permissions-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/pie-executables.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/polkit-rules-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/scoring.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/security.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/sudoers-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/sysctl-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/systemd-tmpfiles.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/users-groups.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/world-writable-whitelist.toml
    /opt/testing/share/rpmlint/zypper-plugins.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring-strict.override.toml
rpmlintrc:
    /home/abuild/rpmbuild/SOURCES/python315-rpmlintrc
checks: 42, packages: 5

python315-documentation.src: E: unused-rpmlintrc-filter "pem-certificate.*/usr/lib.*/python.*/test/*.pem"
python315-documentation.src: E: unused-rpmlintrc-filter "devel-file-in-non-devel-package.*/usr/lib.*/python.*/tests/.*.c"
python315-documentation.src: E: unused-rpmlintrc-filter "devel-file-in-non-devel-package.*/usr/lib.*/python.*/test/.*.cpp"
python315-documentation.src: E: unused-rpmlintrc-filter "python-bytecode-inconsistent-mtime.*/usr/lib64/python.*/.*.pyc"
python315-doc.x86_64: E: no-binary
python315-doc-devhelp.x86_64: E: no-binary
python315-doc.x86_64_v3: E: no-binary
python315-doc-devhelp.x86_64_v3: E: no-binary
The package should be of the noarch architecture because it doesn't contain
any binaries.

python315.spec:235: W: macro-in-comment %action
python315.spec:844: W: macro-in-comment %python315_fix_shebang_path
There is a unescaped macro after a shell style comment in the specfile. Macros
are expanded everywhere, so check if it can cause a problem in this case and
escape the macro with another leading % if appropriate.

python315-documentation.src: E: invalid-spec-name
The spec file name (without the .spec suffix) must match the package name
('Name:' tag).

Check time report (>1% & >0.1s):
    Check                            Duration (in s)   Fraction (in %)  Checked files
    ExtractRpm                                  10.0              71.5               
    BuildRootAndDateCheck                        1.4              10.2               
    FilesCheck                                   0.7               5.2               
    BashismsCheck                                0.7               4.8               
    SignatureCheck                               0.4               3.0               
    SpecCheck                                    0.4               2.7               
    TagsCheck                                    0.2               1.4               
    TOTAL                                       14.1             100.0               

 5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 9 errors, 2 warnings, 20 filtered, 9 badness; has taken 14.2 s